English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

http://thinkprogress.org/2006/09/24/clinton-video/

Very funny and very informative, I have the book by Richard Clark "against all enemies" and the facts there can not be disputed.

2006-09-24 14:28:00 · 11 answers · asked by jl_jack09 6 in Politics & Government Civic Participation

BTW, if you go to the site link you can also read that wallass lied, he has never ask a Republican any such questions. I do not watch any TV it's all conservative propaganda. Look at who owns it. I would never watch FOX news, it's a carbon copy of Rushs Neocon propaganda radio show, all lies. At least Clinton had a surplus all 8 years and now Republicans have a $9 trillion national debt plus $2 trillion for Iraq. Over the next ten years working class tax payers are in very deep Dew dew.

2006-09-24 14:54:35 · update #1

It was Bush who backed off on Bin Laden at Tora Bora when Bush refused to send in more troops. It was also Bush who disbanded the CIA task force looking for Bin Laden. A task force set up by Clinton. It was also Bush who demoted Richard Clark and dismissed Clintons comprehensive plan on terrorism. Republicans love the liar and embrace the lies as truth.

2006-09-24 15:00:30 · update #2

Funny how those who hate Clinton still have said "he was wrong to attack Wallass", "this was below a former president". What a joke you people are, you should watch the video also try to comprehend what you see. Wallace ask Clinton there to talk about Clintons foundation then ambushed him with the ABC doc.story. Clinton would have none of that, Clinton was right on the mark. It was Bush who had 8 months to get Bin Laden and did not even try, at least Clinton tried. Clinton also said "the FBI and the "CIA would not certify Bin Laden as the one who planned Sept.11th." Without that he could not act on his own in the face of all those Republicans who wanted to make Clinton look bad to Americans for elections..read some, start with Clarks book, a first hand factual account..

2006-09-25 02:02:28 · update #3

11 answers

Sorry,I don't get Fox News & sure as hell don't want it!

2006-09-24 14:31:00 · answer #1 · answered by Putt 5 · 1 1

Whose pants were where? If Chris's shorts were pulled up; then a pair of Clinton's panties were on his head.

All facts can be disputed. It depends on the source. Especially facts that are not backed up by sources that have no stake in the matter, unchallengeable sources.

It's unfortunate that an ex-President had to make quite such a spectacle of himself, especially when it wasn't necessary. I don't think Wallace wanted to carry it on so, but Clinton wouldn't relent. It was a obligatory question for Wallace to ask, not a critical one to the interview.

Presidents have made mistakes in all of this mess we're in, going back to Ronald Reagan. George Bush has made his, as has his father. If you want to know the truth, the first mistake was made with the Lebanon Embassy takeover, and Jimmy Carter's ineffectual handling of it.

History has a way of both magnifying mistakes and sweeping them under the rug. Just depends on whose version you go by.

2006-09-24 16:20:54 · answer #2 · answered by Nightwriter21 4 · 1 1

Difference of opinion on that one. What I saw was a has been, shamed former president(and I use that term loosely) loose his composure on national television. He is embarrassed, but why? Hmmmm. Could be that he knows that he should have given the order to kill UBL when he had the chance. He did say he was the closest to killing him than anybody since. Yet, he didn't take the shot. When you are hunting, sometimes you only have one chance, so you had better take it. Still, Clinton is now in the minus points area on my scoreboard. Instead of becoming all defensive and getting into wallaces face, couldn't he have been a man about it and just said, Yes America, I tried several times to kill UBL, but I missed and I am truly sorry. And I support our current president in the war on terrorism. He had no reason to get in wallaces face, or to give him an oratory wedgie. He is supposed to present himself in a respectful, dignified manner. He's a former President for petes sake.

2006-09-24 14:48:50 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

I watched it & then read it, because I asked my husband if Clinton had developed a mental problem. He acted like he was on drugs. Ranting & raving, accusing the interviewer of trying to trick him by asking a question that came from Internet. Jabbing his finger on papers on table.
If he does not like Fox Network, why did he go to interview.
He is not the President so they had no one to complain to. I think someone should suggest a checkup, I think Hillary's success is getting to him .

By the way, He did not say we should come home , he said he would have sent at lot more to Afghanistan to find Bin Laden. I am telling you this was very "un-Clinton" like.

2006-09-24 17:03:04 · answer #4 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 1 2

His bravado was all for the tv.......where were clinton's cujones when he had the chance OVER AND OVER AGAIN to grab Osama?

He has no balls...except when the light of truth shows on his phony "legacy".

2006-09-24 15:31:31 · answer #5 · answered by Joey Bagadonuts 6 · 1 0

Yeah, I loved the way Clinton said, "and you have that smirk on your face because you think you're so clever." I hate FOX, but it was worth tuning in just to see Wallace get put in his place. I wish there were more like Clinton to tell it like it is. BTW you can watch the interview again on youtube.

2006-09-24 14:38:20 · answer #6 · answered by uncle 3 · 2 3

Its funny that conservatives all cry that the media is all liberal biased. Fox News is the ONLY biased news channel and it is conservatively so. I dont think liberal politicians should give credibility to that channel by appearing on it.

2006-09-24 14:46:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

I saw this happen as he was freaking out knowing his legacy was crumbling down around his feet.

http://www.clickfire.com/clinton.jpg

2006-09-24 14:38:57 · answer #8 · answered by Jean R 3 · 3 1

yes he handed wallace his *ss.fox will think twice before trying a sneak attack on clinton again.

2006-09-24 14:39:24 · answer #9 · answered by sasuke 4 · 3 3

I watched him piss his pants like a little child in front of the country. Keep drinking the kool-aid @sshat.

2006-09-24 14:33:01 · answer #10 · answered by Steven B 2 · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers