Is G W Bush a religious man who is guilty of murder?

Question

Today, at long last, President G W Bush acknowledged that Saddam Hussein was not responsible for the 9/11 attacks that killed nearly 3000 people. I think most of the world are surprised it took Bush so long to draw such a conclusion, as most countries new this to be the case over 4 years ago.

If you check out the news video footage prior to the invasion of Iraq, and watch the body language of Tony Blair trying to justify to the British public that the invasion was the right thing to do, and also check out Colin Powell’s address to the United Nations revealing stark evidence of Weapons of Mass Destruction, you don’t need to be much of a rocket scientist to deduce that both men were lying. The body language reveals all.

The invasion of Iraq broke international law, and therefore all of the innocent men women and children who are killed as a result of this war, have been murdered. However, G W Bush has publicly stated that God told him to invade Iraq, so who’s at fault here?

Answer 1

Yes--Bush was a religious man guilty of murder *before* being elected President. He signed more death warrants than every other Governor in the US combined. In other words, he ordered people to be killed in cold blood without need.

Answer 2

Bush is not Christian even though he claims to be. Using God as the excuse for invading is as bad as Al Qaeda using that as the reason for 9/11.

Iraq was a war because US Congress agreed to go to war. US Government does not permission from any country or organization to go to war with someone else. So, regardless of international laws, it was still a war and sadly, casualties are expected.

If anything US Government should be called murderers. We should vote for an entirely new Congress. Do not vote for the incumbant in the next election. And do not pay your taxes.

Answer 3

"The invasion of Iraq broke international law"
Really?
And what Law background do you have to make such a determination?
What about the numerous Resolutions against the leadership of Iraq?
.
.
"and watch the body language of Tony Blair trying to justify to the British public that the invasion was the right thing to do"...
."The body language reveals all."
.
.
Here, you think you're a body language expert?
Wow! You're a busy little girl!
.
.
.
Here's a hint....
Try investigating for yourself instead of parroting something you heard or saw at daily kos.
You'll be doing yourself a great favor.

Answer 4

Lol. First off, Saddam Hussien had nothing to do with the 9/11 attacks. That was Bin Laden. That he was funded by Saddam, at least in part, is not a question. He was.
I will admit, there was not weapons of mass destruction found, and likely, none to begin with. But that does not change the fact that Saddam was a man, and his country, not a country that needed to be stopped. Multiple decades of depravity and more would substiate that.
God has nothing to do with the simple need of decent law abiding countries, needing to do some preventative measures. Is it an absolute, does it have all it's i's dotted and its t's crossed? doubtful. But the overall good is more important than wheather every one is all hunky dorie, and smiles about it.

Answer 5

The thousands of deaths in Iraq are unfortunate. George Bush obviously bears the responsibility for the deaths.

Even though he characterized Saddam Hussein as a murderer, the number of persons dying in Iraq is reaching or excelling the number who died at the hands of Saddam.

As president, Bush received authorization from Congress to act. That helps him to legally avoid being a murderer.

Morally, however, he is responsible for deaths of thousands, even though technically they were were not "murdered."

Since Mr. Bush is a Christian man he should consider the biblical accounts of Kings and Wars. Those wars that were fought at God's command were sanctioned. All others were considered immoral.

The question Mr. Bush will have to answer when he faces his maker is whether or not the war in Iraq was ordered by God.

If it was not, then he will be judged by the almighty.

Answer 6

god is at fault of course
or at least his descendents
God being the Anunaki who who created the Adams race to mine gold for him .(only he was not a real God)
and his descendents the Nephilim and their descendents the illuminati to this day control the power structures on this planet .their headquarters of operations are the Bilderberg group,the U:N.the Round Table and they tell the US ´presidents and other world leaders what to do .
the present strategy is to dominate the world by force(the New world order,Hitler continued)And their Agenda demands a cut in the world population of 60%,as stated by Kissenger at a Bilderberg meeting in Copenhagen in 1998
Afganistan was to create the way for a Bush oil pipeline to the black sea ,Iraq,and now Iran and what everelse is going on,
is a component of a much larger strategy ,and serves to confuse the world and divert the atention of something else they are doing that is far more important .
the question is ,what is that???????

Answer 7

Yes, he acknowledged that based on what we all know NOW.

The whole world, including the Democrats, at THAT time thought he was trying to REGAIN a nuclear capability. Saddam could have PROVEN he was not but CHOSE to not comply with the UN.

I just don't suscribe to assigning "culpability" to the ONLY world power WILLING to end the decade old games that HUSSEIN was playing, spreading dirty "oil for food" money around the world. It was REASONABLE to assume this evil tyrant was attempting what Iran is attempting now.

Do YOU want to be responsible for allowing Iran to "wipe Israel off the map?"

We now have a duty to FINISH this job and do our best to END the virus of Wabbi fundamentalism in the Middle East.

Answer 8

Seems to me your trying to draw a conclusion that no one (including you) knows the answer too.. Only God knows the heart of any man.. that is why he is only the true judge. History will determine if this was a needed decision. it may take another 10 - 20 perhaps 30 years to draw a non biased opinion of Bush's actions. otherwise its just political bullship that you and others are talking.

Answer 9

Hey everybody who posted that Saddam was evil, maybe, but did you even realize that he was put into a position of power by the US? His rule, though distasteful, at least held the area in some check. I think we worry about policing the world too much. The current conflict has destabilized the region and INCREASED the likelihood of Al-Queda gaining power in the western region.

I think too many of you spend too much time reading yahoo answers.

Read this link...Washington Post

Answer 10

GW never said that sadaam was responsible for 9/11. He clearly stated that bin laden was. He simply stated that any country or individual supporting terrorism of the like would be dealt with swiftly. Weapons of mass destruction have been found. I doubt that was the last of them. If you consider terrorists and insurgents to be innocent men women and children then you can call it murder if you want. Had the war in Iraq not come about, REAL innocent men women and children would have CONTINUED to be murdered by your buddy sadaam as we have found several mass graves. If your conclusion is that God decided to murder innocent people then I don't think there is anything that anyone can say to help your demented line of logic.