It's a fraction. How could it be an irrational number? It makes sense. The square root of negative 2: now that's an irrational number.
2006-09-11 18:25:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jazz In 10-Forward 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
When a rational number is expressed as a decimal, then either the decimal will terminate or there will be a predictable pattern of digits. But when an irrational number is expressed as a decimal, then, clearly, the decimal cannot terminate -- for if it did, the number would be rational so in retrospect, 1/7 is an irrational number because it cannot and does not terminate.
ie - 1/7 = 0.1428571 . . . and on and on and on.
However as you present it in fractional form, it is expressed and in fact is a rational number.
Where did your teachers go to school? Sounds like they need to go back.
Darryl S.
2006-09-11 18:37:10
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
1/7 is a rational number because it can be expressed as a faction even though the decimal version of it can go on forever.
An irrational number is a number that cannot be expressed as a fraction for any integers and . Irrational numbers have decimal expansions that neither terminate nor become periodic. Every transcendental number is irrational. - as quoted from mathworld.
2006-09-11 18:36:24
·
answer #3
·
answered by need2know 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
No number that can be expressed as a fraction is irrational. A bit delusional, but not irrational.
2006-09-11 18:24:39
·
answer #4
·
answered by stevewbcanada 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
no, it is a rational number since it repeats
2006-09-11 18:24:57
·
answer #5
·
answered by Robin C 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no....its rational
a rational no. is in the form p/q where p and q are integers and q is not equal to zero
2006-09-11 18:27:01
·
answer #6
·
answered by friend 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
...i'm having a hard time rationalizing it right now!
2006-09-11 18:24:49
·
answer #7
·
answered by R J 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes..
2006-09-11 18:24:51
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 5
·
0⤊
1⤋