VP Cheney defending war in Iraq and Afghanastan as a reason no terrorist has used an Atomic weapon on US soil.
2006-09-11 04:09:55 · 10 answers · asked by kentms 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
The war in Iraq has not done anything to reduce the threat of nuclear weapons being brought in and used in America but the logistics to do so exist...unless we re-think our global policies, it may only be a matter of time....if 11 million illegals can enter...undetected...why not terrorists...and drugs flow across the border...so why not components for a nuclear weapon?
2006-09-11 04:21:57 · answer #1 · answered by Frank 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If you have someone ithat leads a terrorist group that would use atomic weapons on someone then you have to remove that person. An atomic weapon wasn't used on US soil, however a weapon of mass destruction was and I can't believe that someone would bring this up on a day such as today. Anybody that doesn't not support the decision to go in there and remove a leader needs to leave this country. All political agenda aside, I fully support the war against Bin Laden.
2006-09-11 04:39:07 · answer #2 · answered by jdecorse25 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The War in Iraq doesnt reduce threat of terrorists using atomic weapons. It just reduced Iraq's oil reserves and increased the US' reserves.
Like it or not, thats the truth.
2006-09-11 04:29:41 · answer #3 · answered by Cristiano R 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it doesn't. Cheney is a liar.
Iran and the prov en terrorist networks it supports is a true atomic threat to the US but because we are bogged down in a pointless war in Iraq we cannot cope with the real threats we face.
North Korea, China, and Iran are real problems that we face.
Iraq was nothing but a bush cocaine flash back.
2006-09-11 04:11:39 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
What you mean in the same way that no sovereign state has ever used an atomic weapon in anger bar the USA. Tell me does anyone ever believe what that numpty Cheney says anymore,please tell me they don't.
2006-09-11 04:13:35 · answer #5 · answered by Ming R J 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cheney is full of bullshit. Let's see the 3 musketeers apply this same principle with North Korea and Kim Jong IL. Oil is power, money and control. Simple as that.
2006-09-11 04:14:15 · answer #6 · answered by Goddess of Nuts PBUH 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Cheney? I do not even bother to hear what he has to say. Same for Bush. Why bother? This is the most selfish and lying administration ever. And, Bush is so stupid, he doesn't even realize that his advisers are bad ones. A stupid president can survive well-following good advisers. But, what can I say? Only 2 more years of them. G-d help us all----the whole world.
2006-09-11 04:15:55 · answer #7 · answered by Shossi 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
they think of politics first, this is regrettably their first priority. I do think of various the people asserting they prefer to deliver the troops abode actual propose it, there may be some cynics however the majority believes it. there is basically one element they want extra and that's staying in capacity or gaining capacity. some would possibly no longer even comprehend this themselves and rather have faith an identical thoughts they tell the people. Human psychology is quite complicated and the impact on politics is frequently underestimated
2016-11-07 02:34:58 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gives a live demo of US military might , and also gives US Military to test out their weapons and soldiers in actual battle conditionss
2006-09-11 04:12:56 · answer #9 · answered by veeru_pahari 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It does not reduce the use of wmd,s by terrorists
2006-09-11 04:12:18 · answer #10 · answered by highlander 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋