How does war in Iraq reduce threat of terrorism using atomic weapons?

Question

VP Cheney defending war in Iraq and Afghanastan as a reason no terrorist has used an Atomic weapon on US soil.

Answer 1

It does not reduce a thing.

Answer 2

In a round about way it reduces the threat of atomic weapons being used in the US because there is one less country with the technological capability of building a nuclear weapon in the middle east.

No one knew for sure that Saddam was not working on a nuclear or chemical program. Saddam may or may not be interested in assisting Al Quida in deploying these systems.

The islamofacists would have eventually infiltrated Iraq and acquired these if Saddam had been left unchecked...

Answer 3

in case you have somebody ithat leads a terrorist group that ought to apply atomic weapons on somebody then you certainly ought to eliminate that individual. An atomic weapon wasn't used on US soil, in spite of the fact that a weapon of mass destruction replaced into and that i will't have faith that somebody could deliver this up on an afternoon consisting of immediately. every person that doesn't no longer help the alternative to circulate in there and eliminate a pacesetter needs to circulate away this us of a. All political schedule aside, I completely help the war against Bin laden.

Answer 4

anyways, It doesnt

The war on Iraq even increases the threat. It's like this. we know iraq under saddam is israel's enemy, and as america eliminated one of its enemy, it will make this terrorist more free and encouraged to do whatever it wants to