You're not leaving are you? Or just looking for an assistant to deligate your work load to?
2006-09-11 04:38:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kenny ♣ 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Spelling errors (P1: "person's"; P2 "effective")
Probably need to list warnings regarding productivity in other areas of endeavor. Y!A acts as a black hole for time, and potentially leads to the self-delusion that any of us are helping to change the world.
Most of this is simply a cerebral version of W.W.E wrestling: Bravado about the entirely pointless.
2006-09-11 10:28:19
·
answer #2
·
answered by NHBaritone 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Are you sure you don't have a position for someone who can sit around for 15 minutes at a time a few times a day instead?
2006-09-11 10:22:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by lenny 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I thought this was your job? No? The wording was great. One question. Why only Agnostics and Atheists? Are Deists being shunned here...prejudged...dissed?
2006-09-11 10:40:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by AuroraDawn 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
You may want to warn them that risks are involved with this job:
By continuing to come into contact with believers and listening and pondering their own beliefs, through their testimonies you may be saved. You may learn to love and appreciate God. You may even accept Him as your All in All.
2006-09-11 10:59:50
·
answer #5
·
answered by adiahudo 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
I know just the guy...though he is probably busy working elsewhere right now, I will try to draw his attention to the fact you require a right hand man...
2006-09-11 10:20:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by CC...x 5
·
1⤊
1⤋
I have just noticed that your avatar looks on the left now.
For those who write from left to right:
- on the right = watching future.
- on the left = watching past.
You'll be a free agnostic soon.
.
2006-09-11 10:18:58
·
answer #7
·
answered by Axel ∇ 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
You're doing a good job at doing that job.
2006-09-11 12:02:54
·
answer #8
·
answered by Whatever 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Aren't I already working this job?
2006-09-11 10:31:51
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
Close, misspelled "effective". I guess that's okay, since it's an ineffective position anyway.
2006-09-11 10:21:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by fishing66833 6
·
0⤊
1⤋