Leviticus 15:19-30
And if a woman have an issue, and her issue in her flesh be blood, she shall be put apart seven days: and whosoever toucheth her shall be unclean until the even. And every thing that she lieth upon in her separation shall be unclean: every thing also that she sitteth upon shall be unclean. And whosoever toucheth her bed shall wash his clothes, and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the even. And whosoever toucheth any thing that she sat upon shall wash his clothes, and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the even. And if it be on her bed, or on any thing whereon she sitteth, when he toucheth it, he shall be unclean until the even. And if any man lie with her at all, and her flowers be upon him, he shall be unclean seven days; and all the bed whereon he lieth shall be unclean. And if a woman have an issue of her blood many days out of the time of her separation, or if it run beyond the time of her separation; all the days of the issue of her uncleanness shall be as the days of her separation: she shall be unclean. Every bed whereon she lieth all the days of her issue shall be unto her as the bed of her separation: and whatsoever she sitteth upon shall be unclean, as the uncleanness of her separation. And whosoever toucheth those things shall be unclean, and shall wash his clothes, and bathe himself in water, and be unclean until the even. But if she be cleansed of her issue, then she shall number to herself seven days, and after that she shall be clean. And on the eighth day she shall take unto her two turtles, or two young pigeons, and bring them unto the priest, to the door of the tabernacle of the congregation. And the priest shall offer the one for a sin offering, and the other for a burnt offering; and the priest shall make an atonement for her before the LORD for the issue of her uncleanness.
2006-09-11 02:53:30 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
2Tim3:16 states - "ALL scripture is inspired of God,and benefical for teaching,for reproving,for setting things straight,for discipling in righteousness,that the man of God may be fully competent completely equiped for every good work."
2006-09-11 02:54:31 · update #1
I prefer Dr. Seuss.
2006-09-11 14:12:45 · answer #1 · answered by peppermint_paddy 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
rather the choice regrettably considering the fact which you say sin all you have chose and then ask forgiveness so which you're able to do all of it lower back! study shows that the explanation human beings conflict with emotion to locate equitable strategies is pinpointed the area of the suggestions stated as the insular cortex, or insula, it is additionally the seat of emotional reactions. the reality that the suggestions has certainly one of those robust reaction to unfairness shows that sensing unfairness is a trouble-free developed capacity. The emotional reaction to unfairness pushes human beings from intense inequity and drives them to be honest. This assertion shows our trouble-free impulse to be honest isn't a complicated element that we learn. It hence completely illustrates that all and sundry human beings have morals controlled by the suggestions and that Christians are completely incorrect to purpose and declare morals as their very own!!!! yet Christians discovered a fashion around it! government information teach that Christians are distinctly over represented in prisons for sexual, violent and fraudulent crime whilst 300 and sixty 5 days on 300 and sixty 5 days government figures teach atheists make up in basic terms 2% of the penitentiary inhabitants! The Catholic Church is paying hundreds of thousands in repayment for the intercourse/paedophile crimes of their priests on my own! Christians are distinctly over represented interior the divorce courts! Christians invented the seen sin and then the thought you are able to sin, ask forgiveness, get pardoned and start up with a sparkling sheet! So no marvel that they are so professional at it is it? A Christian is a guy that feels repentance on Sunday for what he did on Saturday and is going to do on Monday. - Thomas Russell Ybarra
2016-12-12 06:29:09 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Given the fact we are modern people and know about hygiene and how to keep ourselves tidy I see no reason to make anyone feel shamed by teaching them that. Imagine the damage it could do to a young girl who is having a hard enough time dealing with that which is new only to learn she is 'socially unclean'. Talk about psychological damage.
2006-09-11 08:20:05 · answer #3 · answered by genaddt 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Greetings Mr Darwin,
The passage of scripture that you have chosen to try and discredit the Bible is taken out of the old covenant... That particular covenant was between GOD and Israel "only". The old covenant was law based.... the law was given to show man how sinful he was... for no one can keep the whole of the law because of mans sinful nature (Rom 8:4). Furthermore, the law as a means of reconciling to GOD was only until CHRIST came. CHRIST abolished the 1st covenant and ushered in the second (new testament). The new covenant is for every one who will receive it, and is the only means of reconciling to GOD. Its quite simple now no religious laws or ceremonies... all anyone has to do is simply believe that CHRIST died for their sins by the shedding of his blood and they will be saved. That's not lip service belief that I am talking about Mr Darwin, it is heartfelt sincere belief, and GOD knows the difference....
~GOD BLESS YOU AND ENLIGHTEN YOU WITH ALL TRUTH~
2006-09-11 03:19:07 · answer #4 · answered by wordman 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, it is perfectly acceptable to teach this passage to chidren as a matter of historical record, and as a way to help them appreciate technological advances...
A woman's menstrual cycle, while a necessary part of life, is (to be honest) kinda messy.... let's be honest.. would you wanna go playing around in that stuff... probably not...
However, feminine hygiene products have made this whole process a lot cleaner... Thank God for Stay Free
2006-09-11 03:05:20 · answer #5 · answered by Rev T L Clark 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, we should teach it to our children and we should relearn it if we have forgotten it from our own youth.
Some things are just plain disgusting and filthy. A woman's "issue" is one of them. Who wants to "lie" with a woman while she is having "issues"? Why even sit in the same chair, you may get up looking like you have "issues"? I mean what is wrong with this to teach to our children.
2006-09-11 04:03:18 · answer #6 · answered by adiahudo 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The Bible hates women.
2006-09-11 03:06:42 · answer #7 · answered by AuroraDawn 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I didnt say so away with the Old Test. I said we are no longer under the law, and thats found in Gal.
2006-09-11 02:58:07 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
This has been updated since Tampax came out...
Are you sure Leviticus wasn't slightly bi-polar...he seems to have had issues with just about everything!
2006-09-11 02:59:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
It was written in a different time. Its disgusting really. I think that it should have no relevance in the modern world. It definitely shouldn't be taught to anyone.
2006-09-11 03:00:23 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋