Why should those people who try to get evolution banned and call scientists "specularists" (I've had them answer here) then turn around and live with the benefits of the very thought processes they deny. You can't have it both ways, go back to the horse and plow, no electricity and no medicine or dentistry.
2006-09-10 20:23:40 · 18 answers · asked by Roger G 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
LOL ,Id like to see you make do without the fruits of God's creation.How is your all knowing science going to solve that one!!LOL
2006-09-10 20:40:44 · answer #1 · answered by Mr Toooo Sexy 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
*raises hand high*
Oh, me me me!
You know what REALLY cracks me up? My dad says that there are Amish all the time in Walmart. Even THEY can't stay away from technology, or at least some of them can't! (To give the Amish credit, I don't know if my dad knows the difference between Mennonites, who can have the benefit of some technology but very restricted, and Amish.)
I really think that those who are constantly going on and on about scientific things being false and etc should go back to the pre-industrial age and try to survive. They'd find out that they're more reliant on science than they thought. Wait, second thought. Science, as an ever-evolving (hah!) thing, would still have been around back then. Pre-history, perhaps? No, still science. At the split between Homo habilis (I'm pretty sure that's the last one) and Homo sapiens? Perhaps even that would be too far forward for such people.
2006-09-10 20:30:09 · answer #2 · answered by Ally 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Many historians, of many different religious persuasions including atheists, have shown that modern science started to flourish only in largely Christian Europe. For example, Dr. Stanley Jaki has documented how the scientific method was stillborn in all cultures apart from the Judeo-Christian culture of Europe. These historians point out that the basis of modern science depends on the assumption that the universe was made by a rational Creator. But if there is no Creator, why should there be any order at all? So, not only is a strong Christian belief not an obstacle to science, such beliefs were the foundations of science. In-fact, most branches of modern science were founded by Christians who believed in the Biblical account of creation.
2006-09-10 20:28:24 · answer #3 · answered by AirborneSaint 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Creationists might be wrong but are more logical than evolutionists , evolution taught by Darwin is compeletely wrong as though mere competition could produce from the same animal ancestor a winged bird , a winding snake , a multi legged insect and a Man.. Besides evolution is randon while our present knowledge of the phenomenon of transmutations of elements and biological mutations that takes place in extreme conditions, thermal or radioactive dont let us need to subscribe to the idea that eons of competition for the means of existence caused wings to grow on land creatures and the entire population of the land, air and water to evolve from a common ancestor. According to Darwin theory the fittest survive doesnt explain the extinction of the dinosaurs who rode the face of the earth for 160 million years and were very fit to survive if an asteroid didnt wipe them off!
2006-09-10 20:39:37 · answer #4 · answered by fuschiafish 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
I was thinking about it tonight. MY Sunday school teachers ONLY look into Discovery Institute and William Dembski as the sole scientific source of anything. They think all other scientists are idiots and anti-Christ. If you show them scientific data outside of these two sources, they'll tell u that you have been fool by liberal education/media. It's all the Democrat's fault. Guess what, lots of ppl believe them (my sunday school teacher)!
2006-09-10 20:34:14 · answer #5 · answered by Yiu T 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Without the fruits of science, the earth wouldn't be in the bad shape it's in today. Pollution, overpopulation, weapons of mass destruction, etc., etc.
Maybe it would have been better, maybe it wouldn't have.
2006-09-10 20:35:29 · answer #6 · answered by patient X 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
All science is discovery. Science never created any thing. All that is yet to be discovered is in Gods Timeline not mans. All that is always was.
2006-09-10 20:28:23 · answer #7 · answered by timex846 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
confident they should. yet they do no longer look to be "people of religion". As they declare to be. they're people of concern. they should no longer insure their church homes and mosques the two. yet they do. lower back a teach of no faith.
2016-11-07 02:11:32 · answer #8 · answered by saturnio 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
evolution is not science! there is as much prove to prove creationism (if not more) then there is to prove evolution. However, evolution has been taught AS FACT instead of as theory. That is not science. that is propoganda.
I'm a Christian, I believe in science, God gave us a brain to think and question and seek. But when I see written in a high school textbook that "evolution is a fact" it gets me thinking about where our idea of science starts.
2006-09-10 20:28:22 · answer #9 · answered by Chris K 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
are you on drugs? acid maybe????
i used to believe in creation, then it was the vogue to believe in evolution... now the New Age stuff is aliens....that they created Jesus and the human race over many millenium....
whatever rocks your boat i think... do your own thing, question authority and step lightly.... is my mantra.... good luck
2006-09-10 20:29:06 · answer #10 · answered by Guadalupe Joe 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋