2006-09-10 18:47:20 · 15 answers · asked by curiousT 2 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I guess there is no end to this then?
2006-09-10 18:50:18 · update #1
Oh heck no! There are Thousands of people we could make "THE FACE OF TERROR!!!" Bush will find some excuse to keep my butt out here until the cows come home. He is making entirely too much money putting soldier's lives on the lines to stop now. Bush is a Weapon of Mass Destruction.
2006-09-10 21:14:06 · answer #1 · answered by theronjustron 1 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No. I don't think so at least under our current administration. I don't know if you've been reading the news but the connection between Iraq and Al Qaida was sketchy at best before the invasion. I agree that there must be another reason why we went in and why we are still there. I just don't know what that is exactly anymore since all the reasons for going in turned out to be false but now we seem to be stuck there for awhile longer apparently.
BTW... 2 years ago, Saddam Hussein was captured NOT OBL. Big difference.
2006-09-11 01:56:35 · answer #2 · answered by anonfuture 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, the pursuit of Osama Bin Laden has nothing to do with the current war in Iraq. Capture may lower or even raise the level of insurgent attacks in Iraq.
2006-09-11 01:50:32 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
We could not really until things are going much better there. However we have turned over military decisions to the Iraqi army. Remember we had bases in Germany and and other locations for a very long time.
I have family over there, but I would rather we did the job right.
2006-09-11 02:38:15 · answer #4 · answered by inzaratha 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nope. There will be other jobs that need to be done. We will need to kill off every terrrorist in the middle east. Then the troops come home and then send to another place for some other problems.
2006-09-11 01:50:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
war is always fruitless and tragic....its just a means for politicians to gain or retain power. .....ultimately its we the common people who suffer....did bush lost any of his family member in 9/11 or in afganistan or in iraq???
but a lot of common people lost either their son or their loved one or their father or some relative.....
there is no end to such a dirty thing until we get rid of bloody bastard politicians and get a good LEADER.....
we have to step up and fight the terrorism or this anarchy ....
2006-09-11 02:45:56 · answer #6 · answered by topgun 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
unlikely. because USA has to support the Afghan army from the Taliban and Local Warlord.
2006-09-11 01:51:48 · answer #7 · answered by Hafizul Azrin H 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, because that's not the only reason the troops are out there.
2006-09-11 01:49:04 · answer #8 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no because they have already found and captured him 2 years ago sorry.
2006-09-11 01:49:43 · answer #9 · answered by xistenz1 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I dont think they will ever find him.
Even if they do they'll invent a new excuse to invade other countries.
2006-09-11 02:45:36 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋