Someone must pay.
2006-09-10 15:28:33 · 26 answers · asked by fresh2 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
I'm glad you people are so concerned about innocent casualties...about as much concern as they showed when they killed thousands in 9-11?
2006-09-10 16:14:22 · update #1
Everybody is looking for Osama at the Pakistan/Afghanistan border. That is why I think that Osama is in Qom, Iran. Same place as Iran's Supreme's Leader Sayyid Ali Khamenei. Remember Osama wants to bridge the gap between Sunni and Shia. The US has some control over the Musharraf government in Pakistan but not over Iran. That makes Iran the safest place for Osama. Qom and Mashad have important Muslim shrines so they are the safest cities in Iran for Osama. The Wali al Asr was hidden at Masjid Jamkaran in Qom. It would be the perfect place for Osama.
Even if the US or its allies take military action against the underground nuclear research facility at Natanz, the heavy water nuclear facility at Arak and the nuclear power plant at Bushehr, but no one will touch the holy shrines in Qom and Mashad
2006-09-10 17:08:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Great idea considering scientists have proven that if a nuclear war was started anyone not killed in the inital blast/s would be killed in the following days. Besides, no one actually even knows where Osama Bin Laden is, he'd probably just laugh about it afterwards. I don't think it's really fair to cause the people in Iraq and Afghanistan anymore pain then they've already endured.
2006-09-10 22:42:06 · answer #2 · answered by phoenix 2 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Not nuke but bomb intensely! Nukes will only lead to global disaster. Bombing might eventually get him, but it could also possibly lead our own men and women away from further loss of life in this sad story of a war we are funding so very recklessly. It's a real loser, unless you are Bush or coward Cheney talking! And that's Iraq! Afghanistan is quickly slipping away from us and no one is talking about that. We probably should have leveled that area of the world step one instead of going after sicko Saddam under false pretenses. Bin Ladin remains victorious until WE kill him. Right now he is thumbing his ugly , wide nose at us and it seems he will continue to do so as long as these losers are running the country and this sad example of a war. 5 years and counting!
2006-09-10 22:48:54 · answer #3 · answered by michael g 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
And as we are bombing the hell out of Afghanistan, Osama bin Laden is watching on a wide screen TV in Pakistan. I'm sure he would get a big kick out of that. We know he is probably there and we just made a peace deal with Pakistan. Bush promised to get retribution against anyone who harbored terrorist and we are making peace with them. Another promise broken. No wonder the world is laughing at us.
2006-09-10 22:34:23 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
The only problem is that Osama is most likely not in Afghanistan anymore. We really need to be careful about nuking places, because we don't want to hurt our oil, do we? It's probably better to use large fuel-air or daisy cutter bombs that blow the hell out of people and structures, but don't turn anything radioactive. I figure if those people don't want to get bombs dropped on them, they shouldn't be living on our oil.
2006-09-11 00:54:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Bin Laden is most likely in Pakistan. I t would be nice to catch him but Ayman al Zawahri would be the better cach I believe. He is the master mind. Osama is the one with all the money (or at least was) that is why Ayman al Zawahri latched on to him IMO.
2006-09-10 22:36:11 · answer #6 · answered by scarlettt_ohara 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
You're obviously a foreign policy scholar. What do you really think?
Consider the nuclear fallout and the damaging effects of radiation in the region as well as how many thousands of miles will this fallout travel and what other peaceful countries will be negatively effected.
How will this effect other countries' view of the US after such a horrific undertaking. And will we have any allies after such a strike.
What's the economic ramifications of such action?
Just food for thought after posting a question with very little, to no thought at all.
2006-09-10 22:35:49 · answer #7 · answered by De Expert 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Absolutely not! There's innocent women & children there too. Tomorrow is 9-11, the day thousands of Americans died for no reason, but nuking Afghanistan would only make them hate us more!
2006-09-10 22:35:27 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Of Course you cannot killed 20 million people in order to killed Osama.
That's too cruel man. Their lives is belong to God. Not you
Peace!
2006-09-11 01:49:50 · answer #9 · answered by Hafizul Azrin H 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Gatita N
Bin Laden is neither in Pakistan nor in Afghanistan, he actually lives from Mondays to Fridays in the white house and spends the weekend in camp David with his best friend Georgie
2006-09-10 22:43:48 · answer #10 · answered by me 6 · 1⤊ 2⤋