2006-09-10 09:21:34 · 14 answers · asked by curious_inquisitor 1 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
chrizkatore - How about common sense.
2006-09-10 09:25:07 · update #1
picard - Oh I see, matter poofed into existence on its own, exploded and evolved.
2006-09-10 09:28:11 · update #2
i think trying to define creation at all is foolish
2006-09-10 09:23:18 · answer #1 · answered by ỉη ץ٥ڵ 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why would that be?
Response to you: Common sense tells me that just because we don't know where we came from yet doesn't mean we can make up imaginary answers such as "Uhh... This guy did it... and... he's all powerful?" without any evidence or reason to do so.
I am sorry to have to tell you this, but you simply need to face the fact. I have never heard anything more stupid in my life than the idea that because some idiots (and yes, I am indeed calling you an "idiot," because you fail to use facts and have tried to counter my question without any evidence. Only an idiot would need to do that) cannot understand how the universe came into existance, choose to ignore the TONS of evidence for the big bang and evolution, that there must be an invisible all-powerful being that created us watching our every move.
"how about common sense?"
Common sense disproves creationism.
2006-09-10 16:23:22 · answer #2 · answered by Another Nickname 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not foolish, ignorant. How can anyone actually think that this universe and all the life herein came about by accident? Just look at a bird in flight, or a fish breathing water but drowning on air, or a tree or flower, or bug, or the complexity of just one organ in our bodies. There is no way that any of this happened unless someone extremely intelligent designed it and put it all together.
2006-09-10 16:27:39 · answer #3 · answered by Lola 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No. Because many things happen just following the laws of physics, without any conscious intent.
So, absent proof, it's just as valid to believe that the existence of the universe was a fluke of particle physics and quantum flux, and just as valid to believe that it was all "willed" into existence. Neither is foolish.
2006-09-10 16:25:37 · answer #4 · answered by coragryph 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋
There was no 'creation'. The birth of stars and the formation of planetary systems is an ordinary, common occurrence in the universe. Look up 'planetary nebula', and 'protoplanetary disk'.
2006-09-10 16:33:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Of course. Any real scientist has to agree. Einstein recognized that the natural laws of physics, mathematics, etc. were obviously created by an intelligent Agent. He was just uncertain as to how good God was.
2006-09-10 16:32:03 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ok I figured it out I think that it was creation with divine assistance I mean they have it all figured out how it occured and have duplicated it it being the chemical reaction that occured to create life
but the likelihood of it actually happening are very unlikely and that is where divine intervention comes in ;)
2006-09-10 16:26:14 · answer #7 · answered by Ray C 1 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Creation was no accident...It was God's perfect plan..but then man came along and messed it up.
2006-09-10 16:24:38 · answer #8 · answered by Judah's voice 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't think it was an accident. most things happen for a reason, just don't take any notice of the"accident" theory. believe what you want to believe.
2006-09-10 16:29:42 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Evolution 'accident' is veryy foolish and there is NO evidence that it happened...it requires tremoendous faith to believe such stupidity:
Jesus said:
"From the beginning of the Creation God made them male and female..." (Mk. 10:6)
2006-09-10 16:26:12 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋