Especially interested in comparisons of image quality, noise and value of Sony anti-shake feature to offset noise at high ISO settings.
2006-09-10 09:11:38 · 5 answers · asked by Didgeridude 4 in Consumer Electronics ➔ Cameras
Sony's anti-dust system sucks. It has no effect on dust. See test done here.
http://www.ephotozine.com/equipment/tests/testdetail.cfm?test_id=468
supersteady shot has it's advantage though.
I'm waiting for new Pentax K10D due to be announced this week.
2006-09-10 12:37:23 · answer #1 · answered by clavestone 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Here's a lazy link to the dpreview review of the D80: http://www.dpreview.com/articles/nikond80/
2006-09-10 22:48:04 · answer #2 · answered by maxma327 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the anti shock of a100 doesn't really offer big value but the carl zeiss lenses does
2006-09-11 18:22:16 · answer #3 · answered by jingleh4m 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
a100 has to much noise, i think. sony' s ccd is to terrible.
although canon' cmos is the smallest, but it's cheaperrrrrrrrrrrrrrrr.
2006-09-11 03:06:09 · answer #4 · answered by ziqin z 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
check out www.dpreview.com
they are not side-by-side but, you can read and form some opinion from there.
2006-09-10 16:20:29 · answer #5 · answered by KrautRocket 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋