shouldn't babies be made only in a marraige. unless they were immature irresponsible teenagers.
2006-09-10 09:05:34 · 30 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
If you have a baby outside of mairrage because you weren't being careful and it was an accident: I understand.
but when you plan to have a baby outside of marraige, it puts the baby in a less than desirable situation. who knows wat might happen from then until they get married. they could break up and the baby would not have an ideal family.
2006-09-11 11:51:00 · update #1
This is Tom you are talking about remember, he does some pretty strange things.
2006-09-10 09:11:43 · answer #1 · answered by Gone 5 · 6⤊ 0⤋
They're not married: thank God. Tom is abusive and controlling and she's an idiot for staying with him for whatever reason. I don't believe any of this stuff that they actually had a child; the child looks Asian beyond belief. I'm positive two very much Caucassian people cannot have an Asian child with wicked looking blue eyes. It's just not scientifically possible. The whole relationship is a sham and a quick way for Katie to earn some bucks. Especially when both of them are rotten actors and their careers are going down the tube. The whole sham is only making things worse for them both. And to bring a child into the middle of it all is disgusting.
2006-09-14 21:24:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Well from reading the magazines I know they aren't married yet. Katie Holmes wants to wait so she can lose all her baby weight. But for the part of them having a baby outside of not being married I think it is fine. I mean everyone has there own beliefs and I think it is ok for people to not be married when they have kids. All marriage is a ring and a ceremony saying that you are gonna be together forever, but if you ove someone why do you have to be married? Love is love with or without it documented on paper!
2006-09-10 16:13:45 · answer #3 · answered by MaMa 05 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
they are not yet married in the eyes of the state, but may well have done some cult ceremony for Scientology. They are in Hollywood the standard rules of morallity do not apply. The longer they take to wed the longer until the inevitable divorce. especially when Suri starts to look more like Chris Klein that Tom Cruise
2006-09-10 19:33:15 · answer #4 · answered by janssen411 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Why should Katie have to make her mistake worse? Is it not bad enough that she had a baby with an abusive man. Does she now have to marry him and make it more complex. I hear he has required her to lose weight before marriage. 40lbs or something. People say she sould just lose 160 lbs aka Tom Cruise. I agree. Why should she have to marry her abuser?
2006-09-14 05:16:48 · answer #5 · answered by adobeprincess 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
in an ideal world. i had a baby outside of marriage. i was 23. i had and have no intention of marrying the father. i had no intention of getting pregnant either. sometimes things happen. i was 23 before i went out on a date and i just went for everything. it has nothing to do with being an immature irresponsible adult. i am a damn good mom and i love my little girl. people with narrow minded views like that upset me.
2006-09-10 16:18:07 · answer #6 · answered by bored_ass_little_girl 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They are not married. Neither are Brad Pitt and Angelina, Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon. Some of the reasons include money, legalities, and commitment. Some folks just want to have children, but not a mate. That's why so many adopt.
2006-09-10 16:14:18 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
They're engaged but not married. Sometimes when two people are in love they may choose to have a baby before they get married. Sometimes it's planned, while oher times "Mother Nature" makes the call, but they Are about to get married.
2006-09-10 16:20:06 · answer #8 · answered by Blessed 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
THEY ARE NOT MARRIED YET.
They have a baby without being married because they are weird liberal freaks who do not believe in family values and decency. The child is illegitimate and they are fornicators. Just like MOST of Hollywood - that is why when "the BIG ONE" strikes and California/Hollywood drops off the US - there will be a LOT less deviants in this country.
EDIT - shinell - learn to write proper sentences. You should HAS to be married to have a baby. Go ax your daddy if I'm right...
2006-09-10 16:18:07 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
I agree. But, I mean, there are a lot of celebrities who have babies out of wedlock and they're praised for it. When in reality, it's totally irresponsible and inappopriate.
2006-09-10 16:53:34 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
their not married. they say they will eventaully. the law in california is on your 10th anneversary you get 1/2 of your spouses money if theres a divorce afterwords so you can take care of yourself. tom cruise divorced nicole kidman they day before their 10th anneversary. so he probably wants to stay unmarried as long as possible so he won't have to give up his money. (and yes babies should only be made in marriage)
2006-09-10 16:10:22 · answer #11 · answered by 101says 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋