cuz of the flood..bones dont disolve
2006-09-10 06:12:52
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
2⤋
Fossil Bibles? Not sure what that means.
2006-09-10 13:08:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Thanks for that question, it really tickled me...reminds me of an ex who once asked me why there were no people bones found with dinosaur fossils, cos he'd seen films that had people and dinosaurs in them at the same time.
2006-09-10 13:17:51
·
answer #3
·
answered by shabbathanks 3
·
0⤊
1⤋
Same reason there is no fossil evidence for chickens, not even tracks.
2006-09-10 13:08:44
·
answer #4
·
answered by miknave 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
because all have been found by now..
and there are too fossils of chickens..they just had scales back then is all......
2006-09-10 13:09:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by G-Bear 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Because books don't turn into fossils.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fossils
Also, fossils are much older than the Bible.
2006-09-10 13:17:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by Lucy_Fir 3
·
0⤊
2⤋
Isn't what you are really asking? Is the Bible true or fiction?
Here are some great bible and science websites for you to refer to when you have questions regarding of the Bible.
www.answersingenesis.org
www.icr.org
www.creationworldview.org
www.creationists.org
www.drdino.com
The Bible really is true and science backs it up.
2006-09-10 13:15:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
That is called the dead sea scrolls and other writings like that. Many fragments are found.
2006-09-10 13:10:55
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Probably because the old copies were burned as soon as they were copied. In the times that the Bible was written, the newer copies were considered better.
2006-09-10 13:08:20
·
answer #9
·
answered by The_Cricket: Thinking Pink! 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
because the printing press had't been invented.
2006-09-10 13:13:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by breeze1 4
·
0⤊
2⤋