http://www.frontpagemag.com/Articles/ReadArticle.asp?ID=23865
http://abcnews.go.com/US/story?id=2406097&page=1http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2006/09/07/clinton_aides_assail_show_about_events_pre_sept_11/
http://www.accesshollywood.com/news/ah1540.shtml
http://www.cnn.com/2006/SHOWBIZ/TV/09/07/911.film.clinton.offic.ap/index.html
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/entertainment/5326706.stm
http://www.nypost.com/news/nationalnews/bubba_goes_ballistic_on_abc_about_its_damning_9_11_movie_nationalnews_ian_bishop_________post_correspondent.htm
http://www.calendarlive.com/tv/cl-wk-channel7sep07,0,6155461.story?coll=cl-tv-features
2006-09-08
01:41:37
·
14 answers
·
asked by
nardo84
3
in
Travel
➔ Italy
➔ Bologna
Buddy this! Its about the truth and history, or some trying to re-wright history!
2006-09-08
01:48:27 ·
update #1
As far as the 9/11 commission report - which I have and have read - It's a farce! Too much was left out and ignored; such as "Able Danger", as well as all those documents Sandy Burger stole from the archives.
2006-09-08
01:54:05 ·
update #2
The ONE "entertainment section"link was put in there for YOU - who believe and get information from ET, etc,...
How can you believe that when he is on tape saying exactly what he now is denying?
How do you differentiate between fact and fiction of Fahrenheit 911?
(here comes the spin)
Re-write - pls excuse my government public school training; since that's more important to YOU!
2006-09-08
02:11:12 ·
update #3
ifiknowtruthis.... read the very first link.
If what you believe to be true was, there wouldn't be any actors or even a mainstream tv station to air it being they're all libs like you.
Its airing because of the 5 year anniversary of what it seems you have forgotten what happenend.
2006-09-08
03:57:00 ·
update #4
Anne - There's is nothing whatsoever close to intelligent on moveon's site. So, tell us, why do you want to stop the show?
2006-09-10
10:46:33 ·
update #5
silly liberals tricks are for kids. This is what happens when you play in the big leagues when you lie you get raked.
I noticed that you all were praising farenhype 911 as a critical piece of truth, and that of a convenient lie.....both of which are only slanted versions of truth sewn together so that gullible folk like libs would foment and follow the lies and conspiracies of Michael Moores rendition of 911, & Gores Hot Summer, which by the way has been pretty mild.
2006-09-08 01:58:45
·
answer #1
·
answered by battle-ax 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Intelligent people can go to http://pol.moveon.org/abcdoc/ to sign MoveOn's petition to stop the movie.
An excerpt from: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/14733545/
<< OLBERMANN: You were privy to everything the president read each day, you had daily access to him. Is there any truth to the principal insinuation here that he was distracted from terrorism by the Lewinsky affair?
SEAN MALONEY: Absolutely not. Let me tell you what. I was there. I saw the president every day during the entire Lewinsky episode, from the day it started to the day it ended. And it was my job to provide him with his daily workload, a mountain of stuff that goes through the Oval Office. And I can tell you, that guy was focused like a laser beam on doing his job. And you know what else I did, I saw all the national security information that went to the president every day, including all the information on the growing threat of al Qaeda. And I can tell you, this — President Clinton was focused like a laser beam on it. And I‘m just telling you as a guy who was there. It is a smear to say that he wasn‘t. It‘s a subjective view, there is no evidence to support it. And I can tell you, as a guy who was in the room, it‘s just not the case. And you know who else knew it? The American people. And that‘s why they stood by him, because he was doing his job. And that‘s why he enjoys the favorable ratings he has today.
OLBERMANN: Do you fear that people will actually believe the docudrama, and now put more blame on President Clinton than he deserves for the events that led up to 9/11?
MALONEY: Well, look, why would ABC be so careless with the truth? Let‘s be clear, there is no dispute that there are factual mistakes in this movie, and they are serious. They just say things that didn‘t happen. And ABC doesn‘t dispute that. Now, the president of ABC Entertainment has said it‘s critically important to get it right. So why not get it right? Why not clean this thing up, or take it down until you get it right? You know, I‘m a New Yorker, and those of us in New York are getting to celebrate the five-year anniversary of this terrible episode. And you know what we‘re thinking about? We‘re still getting on handle on what was in the toxic cloud that went out. The families are still grieving with their loss. This should be a nonpartisan day to come together. This is a terrible time, using falsehoods, to inject politics into this commemoration. I just don‘t know why ABC would do it. It‘s wrong. They ought to fix it. >>
2006-09-08 08:46:38
·
answer #2
·
answered by Emerald Blue 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I think that the propaganda piece, "Path to 9/11" should be shown in it's entirety AFTER the November elections. It is obvious that this cheesy manipulated pile of crap was created and funded by the the right-wing to sway the electorate (not all that sophisticated to begin with) to vote for candidates who support the Bush regime's rape of America. That ABC would participate in such a sham seems to indicate that they have either been intimidated or infiltrated by the fascist elements trying to totally control America for their own benefit.
2006-09-08 03:24:55
·
answer #3
·
answered by iknowtruthismine 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Notice that most of these links are in the entertainment section. Maybe it's not about what he has to "hide" but more of a concern that many of you cannot differentiate between fact and fiction. It's a movie, a dramatization. But there will be many who don't understand that.
You STILL believe that lie that Hannity told, don't you?
http://mediamatters.org/items/200407230005
Re-wright? Good grief. Re-write, OK?
2006-09-08 01:44:29
·
answer #4
·
answered by Pitchow! 7
·
2⤊
2⤋
Isn't it funny when they find out that Bush lied, they somehow have to find a way to bring Clinton into it as well? If Clinton screwed up so badly, why couldn't Bush fix it in the six years he's had in the White House? Oh wait...Clinton left Bush with a huge surplus and W is the one that got us into a deficit again. But Bubba is the screw up, right?
2006-09-08 01:49:37
·
answer #5
·
answered by bluejacket8j 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Bubba PROBABLY has so much to hide that he has played out of hiding places. I wonder why the computer deal that he had with China is not mentioned more often?
2006-09-08 02:31:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
He's been out of office for about 6 years now and you are still concerned about him? We are not living in the 90's buddy.
2006-09-08 01:46:31
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
2⤋
If we ever find out about all Clinton did or didn't do , how it hurt US and why , " BUBBA " wouldn't live a week .
2006-09-08 02:04:43
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
read the 9/11 commission report it is different than ABC movie which thy clam it base after
2006-09-08 01:45:04
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
1⤋
Ill gotten corporate backhanders .The Bastard.
2006-09-08 01:45:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by dingdong 4
·
0⤊
1⤋