Probably. Even after eating sweets your blood sugar should not be that high in a person without Diabetes. She may be in an early phase of this disease and should be evaluated by an endrocrinologist. Blood sugar levels can be controlled by diet, exercise and weight loss. I suspect that she may have a problem with the diet part since she has had 2 elevated levels already and also a denial problem as well. She needs to learn to control this before it controls her. Good luck
2006-09-02 10:40:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by petlover 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
1
2016-05-19 02:37:46
·
answer #2
·
answered by Wendy 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
2
2016-09-18 16:23:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Both of those blood sugar readings are higher than the normal range. There are many conditions that can cause a person's blood sugar to be higher than normal. The most common is diabetes.
Your aunt should go to the doctor. The doctor will probably do one of several tests to determine if she has diabetes. One is called a fasting blood sugar. Your aunt will be asked not to eat or drink anything at all on the day of the test. When she visits the doctors office, they will draw blood and test the glucose level. Abnormal results could indicate diabetes.
The other test is a HgbA1C. "Hemoglobin a1c" is a blood test that will tell the doctor what her average blood sugar has been over the last few months.
A family history of diabetes is a big risk factor for having it. I hope your aunt takes this seriously. Diabetes is 100% treatable with the correct regimen of medications. Untreated diabetes can cause heart disease, blindness, limb amputation and even death.
2006-09-02 09:18:06
·
answer #4
·
answered by Mandragon 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Typically, any glucose readings over 140 should be monitored closely. What you should do is encourage her to do a fasting of at least 4 to 6 hours with nothing to eat and only allow the consumption of water. What this will do is allow her to check her glucose levels without any interference of food. If her fasting readings are 130 or above then should make an appointment to see a Registered Diabetes Specialist. It is important to remember that diabetes is not usually preventable BUT it is manageable, especially at early detection. I work with a diabetes registry at a local health clinic. I really encourage you have your aunt get that closely monitored. Her readings can be varied in a variety of different ways. It depends on how long she took her reading after she ate. If her readings are after a half hour after she ate, then I wouldn't worry too much. If her readings are more than an hour after eating I would visit a physician for further information.
2006-09-02 09:18:51
·
answer #5
·
answered by Jo Jo 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
I am writing to tell you what an incredible impact these methods had on my life! I have had type 2 diabetes for 27 years. For me, the worst part of this horrible disease is the severe pain I constantly get in my feet. The pain is so bad that I avoid standing and walking as much as possible. I've got to tell you that within the first month, my feet stopped hurting altogether and I can now walk totally pain free.
Believe it or not, I even danced at my niece's wedding last month, something I have not done in a many years. I've been following the book for six months now and my blood sugar is well within normal range. I feel great!
I recommend you use the Type 2 Diabetes Destroyer to naturally reverse your diabetes.
2016-05-17 00:21:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Judith 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
That all depends on if it was a "fasting" glucose (taken in the morning before she ate or drank anything at all) OR if it was glucose taken after she'd already eaten.
If it's a fasting glucose, then yes..it is possible. Or even possible that he could have pre-diabetes (also called insulin resistance)
She needs to talk to her dr. since it does run in the family. I would suggest a 3-hour glucose tolerance test. That will tell her if she has it at the moment. If the tests come out fine, then she needs to have the dr. check her glucose every visit to keep an eye on it.
2006-09-02 10:28:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Voice 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The timing of your glucose readings is in no way clean on your question. A non-diabetic's fasting glucose usually does not exceed one hundred mg/dL or 5.6 mmol/L and a non-diabetic's 2 hour postprandial (after meal) / random / bedtime glucose usually does not exceed one hundred forty mg/dL or 7.8 mmol/L. Please word that I say 'usually' as there will be some degree of version from standard. i don't use words inclusive of prediabetes or borderline diabetes as i've got faith that they pass over the element fullyyt. there is an approximately 10 365 days lead-in time of pathological harm previous to the glucose being consistently bigger. subsequently on the spot diagnosis and decisive intervention is considerable. this does not mean pharmacological intervention - way of existence replace is often the 1st step. this implies a low glycemic index nutrition regimen with little to appreciate subtle carbohydrates, weight relief while you're over-weight or obese, and regular exercising inclusive of walking 20 to half-hour on a daily basis. i've got faith which you will have 'early' diabetes and a examining of 156 mg/dL or 8.7 mmol/L is ultimate with this diagnosis. Your glucometer could be maximum appropriate if the readings have been taken a minimum of a million to 2 hours aside. i could recommend taking your fasting and a pair of hour postprandial glucose examining on 2 separate days. If the readings are exterior of the reference selection pronounced above then i could recommend which you seek for suggestion from with your well being practitioner. If i might desire to be of extra suggestions please permit me understand. I choose you the very terrific of well being and in all issues might God bless.
2016-11-23 19:33:52
·
answer #8
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Of course she needs to see a doctor to be sure, but yes it sounds like she has Type II diabetes.
2006-09-02 09:01:14
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
no...you should be getting worried when it is over 200
2006-09-02 12:57:53
·
answer #10
·
answered by mnchik468 1
·
0⤊
0⤋