English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-28 19:09:45 · 14 answers · asked by dr_murder_god d 1 in Food & Drink Vegetarian & Vegan

14 answers

"Non-violence leads to the highest ethics, which is the goal of all evolution. Until we stop harming all other living beings, we are still savages."
Thomas Edison, inventor

"The greatness of a nation and its moral progress can be judged by the way its animals are treated."
"To my mind, the life of a lamb is no less precious than that of a human being."
Mahatma Gandhi, statesman and philosopher

2006-08-29 04:28:08 · answer #1 · answered by Katie 2 · 0 1

Depends, if you kill purely for meat because you live in the wilderness, thats OK I guess, if you hunt for the sake of killing, then sometimes eat what you hunt, thats gross!!
If you're a butcher and kill for meat anyway, thats different again!
Then you could be killing the neighborhood cats and making kitty pie, so can't really answer your question completely.

2006-08-28 19:14:56 · answer #2 · answered by maggie rose 4 · 0 0

It is wrong to announce it to the vegans. Personally, I feel that if you're going to eat meat, you might as well be the one to kill it. It always feels (and tastes) good to cut out the middleman.

2006-08-28 19:14:14 · answer #3 · answered by Kuji 7 · 1 0

Only if you dont want to eat

2006-08-28 19:14:18 · answer #4 · answered by dalmation60 3 · 1 0

As long as you are not a cannibal...LOL. I see nothing wrong with hunting and killing animals if they will provide food for you and and your family.

2006-08-28 19:13:53 · answer #5 · answered by Mr Mojo Risin 4 · 1 1

well it's okay if you kill vegetables and plants and eat them...other than that, then it's wrong

2006-08-28 19:12:00 · answer #6 · answered by ~lil' ghetto azn kid~ 6 · 0 1

in certainty the cruelty project is obtrusive and you do no longer choose a bible to work out that. although if--I trust you--ingesting meat has been known with the help of humanity. i think of you're incorrect on your bible references although if. the place does it say God slew an animal to gown Adam and Eve? in certainty, God particularly reported that green leafy flowers are for foodstuff. in certainty, the the Flood became into inflicted through fact of meat ingesting between different issues.. although if--in an concession to known will--God created a clean covenant with mankind wherein meat-ingesting became into approved--so long through fact the blood became into bumped off. examine your Bauble my chum--do no longer in basic terms flow with the help of comedian books. Jesus became into outspoken on the subject rely of weight loss software. What he reported became into between many comments that is not what you put in the mouth that counts yet what comes out--words & deeds. although, he does not fairly condemn vegetarianism (and he became into of direction universal to quickly) yet he condemns changing ethical habit with intense difficulty for nutritional concerns. for constructive, the Church required absention from meat at particular cases. As for animal sacrifices you additionally could make what you go with out of that. for my area i think of it became into their concept. there became into additionally sacrifice of grain. although if, all this ignores the certainty that vegetarianism is extra healthy than meat ingesting--inspite of the certainty that moderation could make up for many shortcomings. Getting sufficient protein on a vegetarian weight loss software is a project rather for adult men. Many meat eaters will argue against the well-being reward of vegetarianism pointing to their muscular, Roman-like physiques. yet i do no longer understand no rely if that's the two eye-catching or healthful. they think of so. it style of feels a swelled head (yet no longer actually) is going with it. Vegetarianism isn't an indication of ethical perfection in my opinion--and that i'm a vegetarian. and of direction, maximum vegetarians are centred interior the extra youthful age bracket--to declare the least. maximum will abandon deliver. you would be silly to take them heavily different than for unquestionably features of character which you would be able to delight in. that's to declare, weight loss software itself does not rely. in the event that they do no longer seem to be in addition open minded, then you definately've your answer.

2016-12-17 19:03:03 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I don't know why you keep using up 5 points for every dumb question your asking...

http://www.all-creatures.org/articles/ar-aninsidelook.html

2006-08-29 03:33:40 · answer #8 · answered by Lipstick 6 · 0 1

no, unless it involves humans. then it is very bad.

2006-08-28 19:13:34 · answer #9 · answered by moehawk 4 · 1 1

yes. get some help.

2006-08-29 00:35:18 · answer #10 · answered by satirecafe 3 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers