English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I'mre-submitting this question as somebody falsely reported it last time and had it deleted, I have asked YA customer care to deal with the person who made the false report.

2006-08-14 23:24:44 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

Reply to Rigo Barragan:
I'm not trolling, I think we have a nasty piece of work here as a Pope, reponsible for the deaths of millions from Aids in Africa by hindering the distribution of condoms the only means of protection, millions of orphaned children and his vindictive and hate-filled attitude toward gay people and women...Benedict does not seem as appropriate as Pope Maledict to me.

2006-08-14 23:36:11 · update #1

Reply to Gary:
Get ready to continue to be amazed by homosexuals like me who have real morals and who really care and who will continue to point out pious crap for what it really is..Pal!

2006-08-15 00:07:25 · update #2

Reply to crm451: doesn't help the many women who don't sleep around but whose husbands do because they have to work away from home for long stretches...condoms are the best form of protection we presently have for sexually active people ...please understand this.

2006-08-15 23:53:17 · update #3

8 answers

lol someone reported it?
Well, as I said last time, this is a thing of linguistic beauty. Nicely done man.

2006-08-15 04:44:49 · answer #1 · answered by mdfalco71 6 · 0 0

No. I think it is clear that you have never been to Africa. Your suggested solution of condoms for limiting Aids is a poor one. Condomns do not stop the spread of AIDS, that is an old wives tale. Science shows that condomns are less than 80% effective in stopping the spread of AIDS!

The best method to stop the spread of AIDS is to not sleep around.

2006-08-15 08:51:04 · answer #2 · answered by crm451 2 · 0 0

I am still amazed at homosexuals like you, Pal, who rage on anybody that has any standards of morality.
The Pope was correct in rejecting homosexuality as sin because the bible condemns it as sin..
So get over it Pal, you're not going to changes things just because of your childish rebellion against God's standards.

2006-08-15 06:49:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

He should have called himself Pope Cthulhu so people would have no doubts about the age old question, is the Pope Cthulhic?

2006-08-15 07:37:56 · answer #4 · answered by bubbacornflakes 5 · 0 0

You could at least include your reasoning for your question.

It looks like you're trolling at worst, or making a bad joke at best.

2006-08-15 06:29:15 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Hahahaha, Bubba, that is too funny!

2006-08-15 07:43:02 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No.He should have been named:
Pope Hitleryouthwhowearstheropesict

2006-08-15 06:28:41 · answer #7 · answered by EasterBunny 5 · 0 1

any reasons to name him such?

2006-08-15 06:31:44 · answer #8 · answered by marcopot23 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers