English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

Genetics, in itself, neither proves nor disproves the theory of evolution. Evolution has tried, for many years now, to explain how we got here without the loving Hands of our Creator, and genetics haven't proven to be the "magic bullet" that disproves all creationist notions.

The theory has become something of a faith for some scientists. Kinda strange, from a group of people who prefer empirical fact over, well, faith, no?

2006-08-14 23:36:49 · answer #1 · answered by stronzo5785 4 · 0 0

Many things prove the theory of evolution is wrong, I don't know that much about genetics but I would say that may be one of the things.

DNA itself disproves evolution in my opinion, cell structure disproves evolution, cilium disproves evolution and the list goes on.

Any irreducibly complex machine in our body disproves evolution, codes for amino acids disprove evolution. Their a motors in our bodies that move things around that turn at 60,000 rpm,can stop and reverse in a split second, man can not produce a motor like that, nothing close.

Leave the theories to the intellectuals, learn the truth about God and his creation, science now shows proof of a creator not an accident. Science shows proof of perfection not slight improvements over billions of years. Sure things change in nature but God is in control.

2006-08-15 06:58:43 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

No, but it is also establishing the fact that God does have a plan for every person and it's detailed right there, except for what YOU do with free will.

Even predentination elements can be found in Gentics, including lunacy, homosexual inclinations, savant connections, etc.

It can even tell you what jobs you'd be best at if we can unravel the coding.

What it can't tell a person without predestination elements is what they will do from moment to moment, but it might tell something about how they react, the mecanism, which is another predestination element. Are you inclinde to being a reactionary or not. Type A or type B?

2006-08-15 06:28:20 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I don't know if this will help or not, but here goes-
Athiest scientists from Oxford University in England have found seven ancestral matriarchal groups from which everyone of european descent appear to have originated (the Seven Daughters of Eve). This goes hand in hand with the discovery that biochemists Allan Wilson and Vincent Sarich of U of C Berkley made that proves every man & woman on earth, past, present & future, can be traced back to ONE human woman. Wow, eh?

2006-08-15 06:25:41 · answer #4 · answered by traydenma 2 · 0 0

Noooo, if anything genetics prove that evolution is true. yes, genetic information is passed down from generation to generation. But if you look each generation compared to each other, you can see evolution. For example, I am taller than my dad, who is taller than his dad, who was taller than his dad. And for school we went to the 2nd oldest house (200+ years) in our state and the roofs were 4ft tall. Because people were shorter than.

We are always evolving. But unfortunately you won't be able to see it for 100s of years. You need a large amount of generations to compare it to.

2006-08-15 06:18:44 · answer #5 · answered by Franko Unamerican 2 · 1 0

Quite the opposite, they are a main foundation of the modern theory of evolution.

2006-08-15 06:17:00 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Umm, did you know that in the evolution process, plants once had lungs to breathe in air. Yep! It has to be so. That's what they used as they "learned" until they mastered photosenthesis! Then they just got rid of their little old lungs and started the process. The marvels of evolution are wonderful aren't they?
http://planttel.net/~meharris1/mikescorner.html

2006-08-15 06:24:51 · answer #7 · answered by green93lx 4 · 0 0

No. Exactly the opposite is true. If you truly understood the miracle of DNA and what the word "evolution" means in the true scientific sense of the word you would not be asking this question.

2006-08-15 06:20:52 · answer #8 · answered by Paul H 6 · 1 0

There's a book entitled The Creation of an Evolutionist by Dr. Jobe Martin. Read it, it has some mind-blowing stuff in it.

2006-08-15 06:27:46 · answer #9 · answered by Kayla 2 · 0 0

quite the opposite i believe. we have organs in our bodies that proves evolution as truth , some organs we have like the appendix i believe , are not necessarily needed for us to survive yet we have them and that proves that there wasn't just an Adam and Eve who were created looking exactly like us.

2006-08-15 06:18:05 · answer #10 · answered by to whom it may confide 3 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers