English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

What is the difference between Iran politic and US politic? Just remember me who has armed the Taliban? So why some could have nuclear weapon and not others? Perhaps if Iran could have Nuclear weapon, the world will be more balanced and some would have thought before trying to modify politic or economy of some country.

2006-08-14 20:55:30 · answer #1 · answered by Frenchjojo 1 · 0 0

Diplomacy-the Iranians had the wisdom to decentralize their nuclear program so it's immune to a quick bombing strike. The US has it's hands full in Iraq so a ground invasion is out of the question. The Iranians have some reasons to go with diplomacy. If they really had a bomb the government would be vulnerable to yet more extreme factions who would like to use said bomb ASAP. Another reason they might not go for a bomb is that economic sanctions would hit restless young men the hardest-yet more trouble for the regime.

2006-08-15 03:55:40 · answer #2 · answered by michinoku2001 7 · 0 0

Diplomacy will not work as the Iranians are following the Kim guidebook of foreign relations. Traditional war is too costly.

Far better to let the two main Muslim factions push each other back into the stoneage. If absolutely necessary (as in they are making any sign of progress towards a bomb) use strategic weapons to take out every bit of technology that might be used in the development.

2006-08-15 04:20:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Iran is crazy. It would be nice if diplomacy would work, but i not so sure it will. Irans prez is a nut job. He is full of propaganda and will use to get the weak minded to think that he wants nuclear power not weapons. I think it will probably end up with war.

2006-08-15 03:51:35 · answer #4 · answered by B 2 · 0 0

Diplomacy is the best bet. War might work but it requires the death of many soldiers & civilians & could possibly cripple Iran

2006-08-15 05:09:10 · answer #5 · answered by quiKsilver 2 · 0 0

War. Diplomacy would be nice but you would need to have
reasonable people governing Iran. But this is not the case.
I Corinthians 13;8a, Love never fails!!!!!

2006-08-15 03:52:15 · answer #6 · answered by ? 7 · 0 0

Coalition Forces in cooperation with Russia should extend their control onto Iran and other adjacent areas. Majority of Iranian citizens will be grateful for that.

2006-08-15 03:51:57 · answer #7 · answered by www.freewebs.com/belles-lettres 2 · 0 0

war wouldnt be the right solution and we couldnt afford the losses right now but then again diplomacy doesnt seem like too much of an option. were in a stale mate

2006-08-15 03:51:18 · answer #8 · answered by BEEFSHIELD 3 · 0 0

they should get rid of Iranian Government, by some sorts of revolutions in Iran, by Iranian people itself,... Since majority of Iranian population do not approve their governments,... Money talks, Monkey Walks,... lets spend some dollars, instead of bombing Innocent family's and child's,...

2006-08-15 04:24:51 · answer #9 · answered by sylvester M 3 · 0 0

Let's just be done with the middle east and do Iran also.

I'm getting tired of all the yap.

2006-08-15 03:50:50 · answer #10 · answered by powhound 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers