only God knows
2006-08-14 18:57:58
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
3⤋
The question is loaded and doesn't really want an answer; the contrivance is agenda-laded. That said ... I'll answer with an equally preposterous contrivance as a comparison -- the 'all gay' world would last probably longer than if the whole world adopted a fundamentalist interpretation of life and didn't use any birth control. I'd bet that continuation of the species would still result in procreative activities for the 'all gay' scenario; however, consideration of the repercussions on limited resources from a policy of 'be fruitful and multiply' and blind reliance on faith would spell disaster, if we consider the 'all fundie' scenario.
2006-08-15 02:23:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
If Humankind would all turn into lesbians and gays, then humankind would still find a way to EVOLVE into a possible way to perpetuate its kind.
In the story of FINDING NEMO...., they did not get the facts right. National Geographic showed that when the mother Clown fish dies, the father fish would morph into a momma fish and the next largest male fish would take its place to care for the nest. Clown Fish are born all male, with the largest of the pack morphing into a female and the 2nd largest would couple with her.... while the rest just "hang out".
If the world can have Hermaphrodite humans, Male Sea Horses pregnant and Clown fishes ( and a host of other creatures ) morphing into females, I don't see why the human species cannot evolve a way to perpetuate its species... IF such a possibility of a Gay World.
So... Answer to your question is... IF we survive the horrors of being killed by bombs, natural disasters and egoistical politicians/leaders who gamble civilian lives to furnish their egos, then I believe the human race WILL evolve a way to carry on.
2006-08-16 17:47:06
·
answer #3
·
answered by Tenzin 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
How long would it last if the whole world was hetero? We'd outpopulate the planet, use up every possible resource, then die out of starvation and go into extinction. The planet survives.
If the whole world was gay, we'd have died out and gone into extinction after the first generation. The planet survives.
Looks the same to me either way. So I guess having both "straights" and "gays" might turn out to have been a good idea after all, right?
2006-08-15 02:03:36
·
answer #4
·
answered by Banba 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
An interesting question. If everyone was gay, some may still have children by having sex with members of the opposite sex strictly for procreation. It's funny how much that idea resembles some religious perspectives (sex only for procreation). Of course, if the whole world was strctly gay, and no one had children, I suppose everyone would eventually die in about 100 years or so, unless we discovered some method for eternal life. It's funny how much that idea also resembles some religious perspectives too (Paul's idea of celibacy intil Jesus returns). Perhaps we could conclude that both extreme religionists and extreme homosexuals want the same thing... the end of humanity. Something to think about.
2006-08-15 02:04:02
·
answer #5
·
answered by Wyld Stallyns 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
the human race is on the brink of extincton right now and it has nothing to do with gays. rather it is the 'straight' like George Bush and Tony Blair who are a threat to humanity. i would rather the whole world was gay and it lived one generation without fear.
2006-08-15 02:11:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by abella 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
quite some time! artificial insemination is a popular way for gays to procreate. the nice thing about gays having kids is that they are ACTUALLY WANTED and therefore are way more likely to be loved and nurtured. lots of str8 people have kids accidentally it seems, and they tend to not parent as well when that happens.
2006-08-15 02:01:03
·
answer #7
·
answered by urbanguy21 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
Well now that would be stupid of mother nature to use the homosexual natural population over reproduction process on the entire species (unless mother nature just wanted to rid herself of that particular species...although the universe seems to like doing it more dramatically...look at the dinosaurs)
2006-08-15 03:00:53
·
answer #8
·
answered by gabriel_zachary 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
Long enough for every last human being to die off I suppose unless there were; fertilty clinics; gay men to donate sperm; lesbians to volunteer to be impregnated and a global culture that endorsed and established gay and lesbian married couples and single parents as the heads of families with children. In that case, I imagine the human species would continue to last for a long time to come. As for this race you speak of; I believe the much talked about race in racism is a race towards Armageddon run by communities of faithful believers motivated by conservative ideological traditions to out work, out fight and out number the rest of the world. I believe the much talked about clash of cultures between Islam and Christianity reflects an on going conflict to determine whose holy book best expresses the will of God as well as a fight between motivated communities of faithful believers over increasingly scarce natural resources of our body consuming biosphere of limited dimensions. I put the question to you: How long will the human race last if racist, heterofascist, warmongers continue to succeed in using religion to motivate communties of faithful believers to out work, out fight and out number competition in a race to Armageddon?
2006-08-15 01:59:08
·
answer #9
·
answered by H.I. of the H.I. 4
·
1⤊
2⤋
Human race would still exist, maybe less populated, but I'm sure someone would jump the fence when they got mad at their lover, LOL.
2006-08-15 01:59:57
·
answer #10
·
answered by nytrauma911 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
It would probably hum along just fine, because many gay people have parental instincts. It's just that babies wouldn't be as much fun to make.
2006-08-15 02:04:38
·
answer #11
·
answered by GreenEyedLilo 7
·
0⤊
0⤋