English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Why wont they build a wall between the U.S. and Canada?

Better yet why havent I heard them say " Imgoing to Iraq to secure the border against Iran and Syria to stop terrorist from coming in."

For all you people out there saying "because Canadians aer not crossing here by the load", then why do these vigilantes say secure our borders to stop terrorists from coming in.

Have some real guts and go to Iraq legally or illegaly to secure the borders there racist people!!

BI-LINGUALS COUNT FOR 2!!

STOP HR 4437!!

2006-08-14 18:53:41 · 34 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Immigration

I just had to give it to See ME. Thats the most ignorant awnser I have EVER read. WOW!! Mexico at War? Building a wall in Iraq to stop terrorists from coming in? WOW!! Im in complete AHH.... with this girl!!!! Theres more educated people in Mexico than the U.S. by the way.

2006-08-14 19:47:48 · update #1

34 answers

they think they're making a difference but they're not...they're just creating more tensions..

Bi-linguals Do count for 2... keep it up...


cmeand 3,, wtf are you talking about?... Terrorists haven't cross the Mexican border to America... Prove it if they did..

2006-08-14 19:01:27 · answer #1 · answered by sly 4 · 4 7

Build a border in Iran and Syria will do nothing for the US of A, building a wall at the Mexico/Texas, Mexico/Cali borders will.

Canadians don't want to leave Canada, they have an excellent country with no wars, famines or half the sh!t that Mexico has right now. And when the Canadians do come they are educated and professional.

Bilinguals count for 2? 2 what.

If i didn't need a military background to protect our borders I would be at the Mexican border right now.

2006-08-14 19:26:47 · answer #2 · answered by sincerely, see me 4 · 2 2

You are on here talking about racist Americans this and that on all the Questions you answer but look at your stupid racist questions you ask. People like you piss me off . You act like you are so innocent the victim when you are a racist *** mother f*cker your self. You try to tell only one side of the story but for racism to stop it needs to stop from both sides. I really don't think it's a question of racism. It's a question of breaking the law.. It's been turned into a racist issue as a defense mechanism. By the way I know a bunch of Canadians. They will visit here but would rather not live here they love Canada.

2006-08-15 15:05:09 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Please understand, it is not only Mexicans, it is everyone who crosses the border illegally. They have their houses with big back yards, and they are sick and tired of people pooping in their yard. Come on wouldn't you be pretty mad. Now I am an American of Mexican descent. Don't you think it makes my blood boil, to see any other Hispanic crossing illegally and they blame it on a Mexican? We are all becoming a nuisance. Now have you taken a look of how Mexico treats our borders, every Hispanic from Central America and South America have to go through Mexico to get to the United States of America. Are those illegal aliens being treated nicely, investigate you will find them being shot on sight with no mercy. Do you know how many of our illegal Mexicans have gone to Iraq and are still there? I understand your frustration but with a better government we could conquer this problem. Let us stop blaming other people and think of a solution.

2006-08-14 19:13:08 · answer #4 · answered by Trigueña 6 · 1 2

This may seem like a foreign concept to you but we here in America try to put our resources to work where we need them most, and that happens to be on Americas southern border. The restrictions for an American of any color to enter Mexico are far worse. They way mexico treats the illegals it finds is horrific. It is the truth about America and Canada. Canadians are not coming into America by the hundreds of thousands.

2006-08-14 19:10:40 · answer #5 · answered by joeandhisguitar 6 · 4 2

I have no problem with immigration. I don't care if the entire freakin' world packs up and moves here. But they need to do it legally. Sneaking into the country and then telling me you're not a criminal is ridiculous. Of course you're a criminal. You broke the laws of our country. Illegals protesting in the streets waving Mexcian flags, that tells me you don't WANT to be a citizen, you just want what you can get from us. And you don't do jobs that Americans won't do, there ARE no jobs Americans won't do, we just won't do them for 2.25 a hour. Wise up. You're hired here because employers save on what they have to pay, they don't have to give you insurance, or pay taxes on you. I'm sick to death of hearing stories of people who paid to have themselves smuggled across our border and then complained about the way they've been treated here. Don't like it? Leave. Illegal is illegal. I have no sympathy for people who break the law and then complain about the consequences. Don't like it? Leave.

2006-08-14 19:41:01 · answer #6 · answered by crazy4crissangel 1 · 2 1

Being angry,name calling,finger pointing or shouting doesn't make illegal immigration legal. It would be more prudent to take that frustration and brainstorm positive ways to improve the economy of Mexico as well as South/Central America. Do this and the minutemen will become a mote point. Be the change. Peace.

2006-08-14 19:03:50 · answer #7 · answered by wildrover 6 · 3 1

We don't secure the Canadian border with minutmen because the canadians aren't trying to leave their country...And the mexicans always talk about how they have pride in the flag and their country and such crap...if it were true then why are they running from Mexico? PURA RAZA LOL

2006-08-14 19:27:06 · answer #8 · answered by christy 1 · 3 1

Wow, you're always asking stupid questions. Look, the illegal MEXICANS are destroying this country at a more rapid rate than any other country. Please stop asking stupid questions, or better yet, off yourself. Oh, and, come on Albert, smarter people in Mexico!? Now that was some funny sh!*!!

2006-08-15 10:13:05 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

as a results of history, i do no longer imagine the time period desires to get replaced. after we communicate antisemitism on the prompt, we opt to communicate it in the context of history. arising a sparkling time period, even no matter if it truly is more effective precise, will detach historic antisemitism from what is going on on the prompt it really is, a twin of in the previous, directed fairly adversarial to the Jews. i imagine replacing the time period into anti-Jewish will serve the same purpose because the human beings who say "it isn't the Jews, it is in uncomplicated words Israel" yet mutually help those who say that all and distinctive Jews might want to collect in Israel so that they gained't opt to be hunted globally. by technique of detaching antisemitism from its historic context with calling it by technique of a diverse call, we are assisting decrease its evil fee. Antisemitism isn't strictly adversarial to human beings of the Jewish faith, it isn't an difficulty that the regulations of the Jews are incorrect. This concept is something i visit settle for. i visit settle for someone arguing that the be conscious which the Torah is attempting to portray isn't good. that's amazingly interior the same way that i have self assurance the be conscious, or the regulations of Islam are literally not good. yet this isn't what antisemitism is. it is the dislike of each Jew in spite of his faith, regardless if that individual is a non secular Jew or a mundane Jew. it truly is in uncomplicated words that undeniable actuality that the man is of Jewish ancestry that's the rationalization to hate. it truly is a hate in accordance to racism, it truly is in accordance to ancestry, and by no skill on non secular beliefs. for this reason i imagine the time period antisemitism, it really is a racial time period describing ancestry, suits the outline more effective efficient than anti-Jewish, which in the different case might want to be excused as merely a conflict of words with the non secular regulations of that faith. those are both causes i imagine the time period might want to stay because it truly is.

2016-11-25 01:49:26 · answer #10 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

They're not racist and they're performing a useful function. We need a wall at Canada also Going to Iraq has nothing to do with our own borders - this is not a valid comparison.

2006-08-14 19:02:11 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

fedest.com, questions and answers