how about in case of natural disaster , does it benefit America to leave them behind or to wait untill they get sick ???
2006-08-14 15:28:54 · 15 answers · asked by game over loves evanescence 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Immigration
deac u are contradicting your self you say anyone should be treated and the they should be deny medical treatment , how do u know that it' s not happening already . how . i am amking the problem bigger so u can see it clearer .
2006-08-14 15:44:15 · update #1
*making .......
2006-08-14 15:44:59 · update #2
your alone in that one JD
2006-08-15 11:37:32 · update #3
You bring up an interesting point. Should an epidemic arise, it would be smart to set up clinics that give EVERYONE the shots and not require any identification, so the WHOLE population is safe.
Of course, by the time that the government talks and talks about it, the epidemic will have hit vast numbers. WE'RE ALL DOOMED!
2006-08-14 15:36:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Which Is Another Good Arguement FOR Deportation
in case of an epidemic sickness
in case of natural disaster
Medical Facilities Should Be AVAILABLE To Citizens
In Need Of Medical Care
Medicines And Supplies Should Be Reserved For Citizens
This Is The USA
AMERICA FIRST
All Others Suck Your Own Mommas Titty
We Have Enough Citizens In Need
DEPORT The ILLEGAL ALIENS NOW
So We Won't Have To SUPPORT Them Later
2006-08-15 01:03:24 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
First of all, illegal immigrants are NOT denied medical care. It is against the law to consider or to ask a person their status if they show up at E.R. seeking medical care.
Secondly, if that were the case, the state of California would not have lost (closed) 67 emergency rooms due to non-payment of outstanding medical bills by illegal aliens.
It is inhumane to deny medical care to any person, legal or illegal. I fail to see how this could be done without overwhelming outcry by the American public. We may be sick and tired of the illegal invasion, but we are still a compassionate country, as evidenced by our continous generosity in the face of worldwide disasters.
Truthfully if there is ever an epidemic of enormous proportions, I believe that only the fat at the top will receive the best medical care while the rest of us, legal and illegal alike, will be hung out to dry.
2006-08-14 22:45:04 · answer #3 · answered by socalrogueling 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
In the event of an epidemic it would be unethical not to treat undocumented people. It would also be beneficial to the rest of the population for the undocumented people to receive medical care. If undocumented people are ill, then even people with lots of medical care are likely to succumb to the disease.
Consider Small Pox; there needs to be a certain percentage of the population that is vaccinated against it in order for the vaccine to be effective.
2006-08-14 22:51:02 · answer #4 · answered by professional student 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In case of an epidemic we must provide care for everyone we can in order to stem the spread of the disease. However, why wait until the epidemic hits us. Illegal immigrants are bringing diseases into America that we nearly eradicated here years ago. Control our borders, deny welfare and health care to illegals, and deny citizenship to children born to illegals while in the US. That will solve many, many problems. I am not against immigration, just feel all should go through the proper channals.
2006-08-14 22:39:40 · answer #5 · answered by deac 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Obviously not! In the case of an epidemic, everybody will have to be treated or quarantined ... and in the case of a natural disaster, everybody will have to be helped ... that has absolutely nothing to do with illegal immigration ...
2006-08-14 22:42:08 · answer #6 · answered by Sashie 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
In case of an epidemic or natural disaster, Uh no. No one should ever be denied medical treatment. Ever. Doesn't matter what color, race, size, origin or otherwise. NO ONE should be denied medical treatment. Can I get any clearer?????
2006-08-14 23:01:40 · answer #7 · answered by Golosa 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
They need to go home, once less problem for us. Did we bring everyone else over after their disasters?
2006-08-14 22:44:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not if they were here, no. It would be absolutely necessary to give anyone here medical care in an epidemic.
The point is that they SHOULDN'T be here, however.
2006-08-14 22:43:27 · answer #9 · answered by DAR 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
http://video.google.ca/videoplay?docid=-5004704309041471296&q=Alex+Jones+C-Span
C-Span aired this in late June. You need to watch it, discuss it with others and share this with everyone you can.
I don't want to see any comments until 1,5 hrs from now. If you can't watch the the show, then your post is meaningless. Any negative posts need to be backed up please.
I know the truth is scary but we all need to wake up to it.
Watch the damn show!
2006-08-14 22:31:53 · answer #10 · answered by chadman 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋