Assume with me for a moment that you have a soul mate. Would you rather meet them, spend one glorious year with them, and then have them taken from you, or never have met them, never knowing such love, and live your entire life with a person who offers you mediocre love?
2006-08-14 15:03:59 · 7 answers · asked by coolnessa8 2 in Family & Relationships ➔ Singles & Dating
I would surely want to meet her even if only for a year, you will always have great memories...
2006-08-14 15:09:07 · answer #1 · answered by Tim 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
well now hon i don't know that i would like either situation but since i have to choose I'd go with the first, but if you've never known such love then you can't miss it, but i hope and believe that for each of us there is a special someone for us, it's just that some of us rush into relationships with others because of money or looks and then get divorce in a year, my mama always said when in doubt leave it out, i say leave him out. anyhow all the best.
2006-08-14 15:12:22 · answer #2 · answered by diva anne 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with that statement completely... It's better to have those great memories of that amazing person than to never experience love at all.
2006-08-14 15:15:38 · answer #3 · answered by tweenky1982 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes being in love is worth the pain of losing it
2006-08-14 15:12:20 · answer #4 · answered by christsluv4u 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I agree with the statement but think it sucks when you loose the one you love no matter the reason.
2006-08-14 15:08:47 · answer #5 · answered by Jim 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
to love is far better even if you lost it later, because love would refresh your soul every single minute you lived your love .. and when you loose it , you loose it apparently , but it would be kept deep in your soul ..
2006-08-14 15:11:08 · answer #6 · answered by horras 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would want the whole enchilada!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2006-08-14 15:09:05 · answer #7 · answered by fullofsunshine 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋