English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories
60

Why is it that when "anti-illegal" people say they are ONLY against ILLEGAL immigration, the people who are "pro-illegal" turn around and say that those people are anti-IMMIGRATION (they leave the "illegal" off) and that the country was founded on IMMIGRATION (completely ignoring that the other person said only illegal immigration, and also call them racist)? Is anyone else seeing the spin there? Is their "pro-illegal" debate THAT weak?

2006-08-14 14:26:56 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Immigration

8 answers

Because they CANNOT defend there ILLEGAL activities and it leaves them with nothing left but to pull the Legendary RACE CARD. It amazes me how they DEFEND Criminal activity Almost like there doing something Great breaking the law.

2006-08-14 14:35:08 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 9 8

Its called reverse psychology. Making a virtue out of "illegal immigrants" who just want better lives, forced to leave children behind to provide them of a better future, endangering their lives to cross the desert for greener pasture, who toil the earth because gringos are too good for that task...Abiding by the law is not a virtue and not part of their script. And anti-illegals play the part of the antagonist of their soap opera. Oh, poor poor Jose!!You have done nothing wrong and look how they persecute you!!!

2006-08-14 21:46:29 · answer #2 · answered by fanofkeanur 3 · 8 3

I believe part of the reason is because to immigrate legally to the US it's pretty much impossible for someone who comes from a third world country. If you check out the requisites to be able to apply, it's extremely difficult. You have to be a genius, or have a looooot of money, or have good connections, in order to get a long term visa in the US.
So bieng against illegal immigration is similar to being against normal human beings immigrating to the US.
I don't believe it's right to do anything illegal, but what would you do if you were living in a country where you're income as a professional is $500 a month? And if you have a family to support and you know that on the other side of the border you can earn $1200 cleaning up houses?
Get's you thinking, uh?

2006-08-16 15:22:18 · answer #3 · answered by eharo 3 · 13 7

It's all about media spin. And how they can get the "Great Unwashed" to believe it.

And, yes, their pro-illegal debate is that weak!

2006-08-14 21:32:52 · answer #4 · answered by Firefly 4 · 7 3

Sure it is, haven't you noticed? If you want to protect the country's laws and borders, you're a racist .... don't ask me how, but that seems to be the way it is ....

2006-08-14 21:36:41 · answer #5 · answered by Sashie 6 · 7 4

Yes it is weak.

2006-08-15 00:32:56 · answer #6 · answered by *** The Earth has Hadenough*** 7 · 4 3

Yes, their arguments are exactly that. WEAK.

2006-08-14 21:32:25 · answer #7 · answered by Renegade. 3 · 7 3

Because they are idiots!

2006-08-14 21:33:34 · answer #8 · answered by Mike S 2 · 5 7

fedest.com, questions and answers