Why is it that when "anti-illegal" people say they are ONLY against ILLEGAL immigration, the people who are "pro-illegal" turn around and say that those people are anti-IMMIGRATION (they leave the "illegal" off) and that the country was founded on IMMIGRATION (completely ignoring that the other person said only illegal immigration, and also call them racist)? Is anyone else seeing the spin there? Is their "pro-illegal" debate THAT weak?
2006-08-14
14:26:56
·
8 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Immigration