i think they shouldnt ,but why do they do it anyways ,the babys gonna suffer!!!
2006-08-14 13:17:11 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Health ➔ Diseases & Conditions ➔ Other - Diseases
No, they are only giving birth to a child, that will die, at an early age because of the desease that you gave them.
So I would concider adoption
2006-08-14 13:22:38 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Fortunately, not all babies born of an HIV+ mother end up HIV+. Most babies contract the virus during delivery. Studies have shown that if the mother is treated with anti-viral drugs during the pregnancy to make sure that the viral load is as little as possible prior to delivery and she is given a C-section there is a better chance of not passing it on to the baby. Is this a chance that I think HIV+ women should take if they know they are positive? I personally think that any chance to pass this on to a baby is too high, but am thankful that treatment options are much better than they used to be.
2006-08-14 13:53:42 · answer #2 · answered by petlover 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Chloe and Luca are my favorites. I even have not at all somewhat been prepared on the call Elijah, in spite of the undeniable fact that I do basically like the nickname Eli. Ezekiel is a sprint too unusual for my liking yet I do basically like the nickname Zeke. Shiloh basically jogs my memory of a dogs. Skye looks a sprint infantile and trashy to me. Lola, Cecilia, and Layla are not undesirable yet i for my section choose Chloe.
2016-09-29 06:47:38 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They should not, to control the spread of HIV. Besides, the innocent baby will only suffer the stupidity and ignorrance of their parents.
2006-08-14 13:24:36 · answer #4 · answered by Sam X9 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
maybe in the future, when we identify the method of mother-foetal tranmission of the virus and the best way to prevent it
hiv people should have a chance to experience life as we know it too you know, but not at the expense of the baby
2006-08-14 13:23:35 · answer #5 · answered by KingRichard 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
no, they should not but sometimes it happens anyway even with birth-control. other times, ppl are just selfish and don't care about bringing an innocent life to suffer right along with them.
2006-08-14 13:22:51 · answer #6 · answered by lady sixx 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No they shouldn't. It is a selfish act and you are right, the child will suffer.
2006-08-14 13:22:52 · answer #7 · answered by School Nurse 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
THEY SHOULDN'T!
2006-08-14 13:22:35 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋