2006-08-14 11:59:47 · 42 answers · asked by ? 5 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
I have two daughters and you're scaring me. Maybe I should buy them chastity belts...
2006-08-14 12:00:40 · answer #1 · answered by ? 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Actually, it has been proven that the abstinence only sex ed, leads teenagers to be more likely to have unprotected sex and fails to prevent at least half of them from having sex at all. Sex is a natural desire and will need to be fulfilled. How it is fulfilled, depends on the person/people involved.
2006-08-14 12:32:42 · answer #2 · answered by Moonsilk 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, it does not matter what age you are, one must go to the bathroom. Kids dont HAVE to have sex at a young age. You make it sound like kids and parents have no control over their actions. Parents need to be parents and not make excuses or justifications for their and their kids actions. Parents also need to be parents to kids and not friends to their kids. Unfortunately, we live in a society where people are rarely held accountable for what they or their kids do. People are afraid to say no to kids because people today think that if kids feelings get hurt that they will be scarred for life. Children are very resilient though, its OK to hurt their feelings by punishing them for having sex at a young age. I mean I don't think people should have wait until marriage but they should be older and wiser so that they can deal with the consequences of their actions. Is it possible to control every facet of your kids actions? No, but good parenting will greatly limit the amount of children having sex and teen pregnancy.
2006-08-14 12:12:44 · answer #3 · answered by Ra 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
No. But we are asking a person to practice self-control. Is that so difficult?
Advantages to waiting until marriage.
1) No comparisons to someone better or worse in bed.
2) No chance of someone doing the math when your first child is born.
3) A person who is a lot less likely to cheat (although it didn't work in Jessica Simpson's case)
4) Your sexual partner is committed to YOU and more likely to be interested in making love, not just getting their hormonal urges satisfied.
5) No STDs due to previous partners.
6) You know he/she will still be interested in you after having sex.
2006-08-14 12:06:53 · answer #4 · answered by Searcher 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
No, not at all... although I didn't care to release the fact but I myself am 15... mostly I didn't care to release beacuse I didn't care for people to think of my opinion or what I have to say is any less knowledgeable than the next person.
I however and proud to wait till marriage and considered an act of worship towards God because it shows I believe in his word, plus I believe it will only create a healthier marriage in the future...
2006-08-14 12:03:36 · answer #5 · answered by schr91 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
All you can do is provide the best advice you can. And make sure they know if they do decide to engage in sex before marriage, the many different types of birth control that is available today.
It may be nice to avoid sex before marriage, but it's not realistic...
2006-08-14 12:05:41 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
No, although both are bodily functions, the desire for sex can be both controlled and put off either indefinitely or forever, as in the case of priests, nuns, or others devoted to chastity.
The bodily functions of emptying the bowels and bladder are absolutely necessary for the function of the human body. Sex is not. It is simply a hormonal desire that can be either fulfilled or not.
If your illogical example were correct, widows and old maids would die from lack of sex!
2006-08-14 12:09:59 · answer #7 · answered by LL 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
No it's like saying if you're going to become one flesh, do it right! Do it in love. You have a good attitude of value for life don't you? Friendship should be in an intimate realtionship, marriage should be a stronger friendship...or else what is it? A business of your own passion and convenience? Muhahahahah! Humans make me sick! oh wait...i am one! Don't look at me i'm a normal human, not alien from outerspace spying on human stupidity...uh, i mean strange behavior. Muhahahaha! I am Zim! ....LOL i like being silly.
2006-08-14 12:04:09 · answer #8 · answered by Cyber 6 · 0⤊ 2⤋
No, they should not do it. When you lose your virginity to someone you love it is a lot more sacred than just losing it to anyone. My biggest mistake was losing it before marriage. It was wrong of me to do it. The person I was with had four partners before me. Anyone of them could have been with others and carried AIDS or any other STD, lucky they did not, but I was in fear for a while. Believe me, it was something I regretted.
2006-08-14 12:09:34 · answer #9 · answered by Andrea 5 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Yes
2006-08-14 12:03:54 · answer #10 · answered by kim_mii 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I don't believe so, because for some like myself, we just aren't able to find anyone to have sex with, in other words virgins past 20, sometimes aren't virgins because of their own choice.
I'm 22 now, and my small intestine never exploded from a lack of sex...neither did my balls.
2006-08-14 12:04:21 · answer #11 · answered by D 4 · 1⤊ 1⤋