English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

From what I've heard Al Quada doesn't discriminate, Why should we?

2006-08-14 06:18:45 · 11 answers · asked by crazygreeniis 3 in Politics & Government Civic Participation

11 answers

Actually the idea of racial profiling does make sense, but I look at it a little differently. If we did manage to use racial profiling the al queda network would use that against us. They'd simply hire a young white woman who is on drugs and have her meet one of them on an airplane; and she'd have no idea what she was doing. She'd be doing it for the drug money....so in essence the lack of racial profiling may actually make everyone safer.

2006-08-14 06:23:24 · answer #1 · answered by netjr 6 · 0 0

Until we can come up with a way to profile people by response and communication and sensors, there is gonna be this profiling. Life is not completely fair. Religious profiling is done every day in the workplaces, particularly in the government. At my workplace, for years, if you were not catholic, you were not promoted. Wrong? Yes. But time and reason will heal all that.

2006-08-14 07:12:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Racial profiling main flaw is the premise that people of the majority race are to be trusted. If Al queda begins recruiting and making terror cells of western european descent racial profiling is useless.

It's always going to be around, it's just a question of which race gets targeted.

2006-08-14 10:43:56 · answer #3 · answered by rogue chedder 4 · 1 0

Racial profiling should be stopped as it is time consuming and ineffective.Change the policies people hate and he terror stops.Everyone looks like a potential terrorist anyway.

2006-08-14 07:01:20 · answer #4 · answered by David S 4 · 0 0

Look, if 99 past captured terrorist plotters were brown-skinned, bearded muslims, what are the odds that the next 1 will be a brown-skinned, bearded muslim???

When you intentionally overlook the obvious, it is stupidity.

Frankly, if the police look for a light-skinned, tall, older, chubby guy, and they stop me for questioning, I don't consider it anything except doing their jobs.

2006-08-14 07:23:07 · answer #5 · answered by snvffy 7 · 0 0

It is sheer idiocy NOT to implement racial profiling! These people are willing to take their infant children with them to blow up planes!

The time to fart around with this is over-it's time to put aside political correctness and get real.

2006-08-14 09:51:47 · answer #6 · answered by kelly24592 5 · 0 1

It's not called "racial" profiling; it's called criminal or terrorist profiling -- and it must be done to protect innocent people from the murdering crazy lunatics who don't give a ratsass about you and me.

2006-08-14 06:44:57 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Timothy Mcviegh is the main arguamnt. It is more politics, but I know a girl who works TSA and she stops more arabic looking people for surre

2006-08-14 06:24:19 · answer #8 · answered by billyandgaby 7 · 0 0

JUST NIX THE WORD RACIAL IT IS NOT ABOUT RACE BUT IT SEEMS TO GET SOME PEPOLE UPSET ...... BUT PROFILE FROM THE MIDDLE EAST IS A MUST.

2006-08-14 07:04:00 · answer #9 · answered by DC 2 · 0 1

They can and should profile in every way they feel they need to to stop terror attacks.

2006-08-14 06:24:21 · answer #10 · answered by ZCT 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers