2006-08-14 04:21:48 · 15 answers · asked by Moe 1 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Jokes & Riddles
...its pathological...
and usually no, except that i know one, so yes if it were them telling me
2006-08-14 04:54:05 · answer #1 · answered by liz n 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Absolutely not. They can be a pathological liar, but the definition of physiological is the technical way something works. They would have their words confused.
2006-08-14 14:05:29 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're meaning Pathological Liar, yes?
2006-08-14 04:26:22 · answer #3 · answered by ★Fetal☆ ★And ☆ ★Weeping☆ 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well i dont lie, I just dont tell the truth. there for I'am no such thing as a pathological Liar. There is no such thing as physiological liar so there for that person is the one who lies
2006-08-14 05:30:38 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
No, cause you can't be physiological liar.
2006-08-14 04:44:00 · answer #5 · answered by alloy 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You mean pathological liar and this is not a serious question it is a very old paradox question.
2006-08-14 04:36:24 · answer #6 · answered by » mickdotcom « 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If you mean a pathological liar......
That's a good question!!
2006-08-14 05:47:52 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
the word is 'pathalogical' liar. it refers to someone who lies so much that they themselves don't even know or is aware that they are lying. if they say they are and you are with them any length of time they will prove this to you.
2006-08-14 04:30:39 · answer #8 · answered by chris a 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It's a contradictory statement. If s/he was one, s/he would lie about it, wouldn't s/he? I'd think this is sth supposed to be funny or tricky...
2006-08-14 04:29:17 · answer #9 · answered by nelabis 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
If they were sweating bullets and turning pale while telling me, then yes, I would!
2006-08-14 04:30:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋