Intellegent design states that life is too complex to have come about on its own and that it had to have been designed by an intellegent being - hence the name intellegent design.
It makes NO mention of who that intellegent designer is.
Aren't Aliens supposed to be intellegent beings? Can an intellegent designer prove that it was NOT Aliens that designed us?
By failing to name the designer, does intellegent design promote the belief in Aliens?
And no, I do NOT believe in Aliens, just wanted to point out the absurdity of Intellegent design
2006-08-14 04:05:08 · 7 answers · asked by urbanbulldogge 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Religion & Spirituality
006,
Thanks, that was GREAT!
2006-08-14 04:15:11 · update #1
Blizgammer,
Nowhwere in Intellegent design does it say that god is involved. Please show me a paragraph where god is mentioned. Do not show me a conclusion that some person has come to, but a parapraph from the theory itself (in otherwords, that can be found ANYWHERE the theory can be found.
2006-08-14 04:44:01 · update #2
Flying spaghetti monster.
Look it up in google, the product of ID. :-)
2006-08-14 04:09:24 · answer #1 · answered by 006 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It would be much easier to believe aliens are from intelligent design than from evolution. For me it is just impossible to believe everything started by chance and that man is the only thought processing being on the earth. All others are animal species. For some reason, man would have been the only group to be able to start thinking for themselves and create all the technology we now enjoy. Why hasn't an animal came along that could do that.
2006-08-14 04:56:18 · answer #2 · answered by tobinmbsc 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The conclusion of the intelligent design theory is that there must be a God that designed and created the universe. So, I guess you never read the last paragraph. Or, you did like most atheists, and skimmed, and ran with the first thought you had without putting any real thought into it.
2006-08-14 04:18:45 · answer #3 · answered by blizgamer333 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
this isn't some thing new in any respect. The Church has continually -- and that i mean continually -- been formally silent on the problem of extraterrestrial existence. even if extraterrestrial existence exists or no longer is a question for technological awareness, no longer faith. So, as with all different medical problem, the Church is silent on the problem. that signifies that Catholics are loose to believe that extraterrestrial existence ought to exist. we are also loose to believe that it does no longer exist. And no longer some thing contained in the archives article you linked is any diverse from what the Church has ever stated -- or no longer stated -- about this problem. with the aid of ways, one area of the article -- the area that asserts that Church practise in Galileo's time held that the solar moved around the earth -- is carefully and punctiliously fake. The Church hasn't ever had a suitable practise on even if the solar strikes about the earth, or vice versa. back, it is a question for technological awareness, no longer faith. and that is not any longer what Galileo were given in hardship for. also, he become under no circumstances charged as a heretic. He become charged with practise unproven medical recommendations --- and, on the time, his recommendations were unproven. .
2016-12-06 12:42:36 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I actually favor the idea of alien interference with our evolutionary process. Not that they neccessarily "created" anything, but rather manipulated purhaps the early life-forms in order to promote more intelligence, and leave their mark.
2006-08-14 04:12:08 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
There are plenty of flying saucer religions but they don't say who created the aliens.
2006-08-14 04:12:16 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
people do actually believe this.
2006-08-14 11:00:32 · answer #7 · answered by LongAgo 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋