I believe it is. It's just a matter of time.
2006-08-14 03:44:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by can2gone 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
The battle against Islamic Fascists is at least 2500 years old and is certain to lead to another war, since sixteen have already been fought trying to win this battle.
I am an adherent of no war should be religiously based. What we have done, is make the Middle East important because of our thirst for their oil, when in reality, if they could not sell their oil, then they would return to date farming and nomadism around the deserts of the area. The US has the technology and the means to develop other forms of fuel and transportation, but because the oil companies influence the government right up to the President we will be locked into this battle for oil supremacy.
2006-08-14 03:48:36
·
answer #2
·
answered by yes_its_me 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
FYI. The terms 'World-War III' and 'Islamic Fascists' are now protected by Copyright therefore they cannot be used without the written authorization of the White House Writers group, RNC communications, the James Whoolsey Group and FOX News Corp. Cease and Desist.
2006-08-14 04:10:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
Being adversarial to Islamic extremism doesn't make you a fascist, no. Stirring up extremely-nationalistic fervour by technique of demonising an complete faith, and taking to the streets, chanting 'muslims out' with a set of human beings, lots of whom have records as football hooligans, might want to extremely reasonbly be construed as being 'slightly facist' i'm nevertheless no longer a supporter of UAF both. i'd be if their procedures were non-violent.
2016-11-25 00:28:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by pavoni 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
There is no battle against islamic fascists they are supported by the USA in Saudi Arabia and the Gulf States as are the jewish fascists in Israel.
2006-08-14 09:44:58
·
answer #5
·
answered by brainstorm 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Not at present. Out of 57 Islamic nations not one supports them openly. Some of them do so covertly. So it can not be WWiii, unless the scenerio ahead brings Iran and Syria in to open conflict with Israel and US. That I feel is very unlikely since most nations today want peace and prosperity for their people. This is not possible unless here is peace and development. All Islamic nations who sit over stockpile of oil riches know that any conflict with Israel and US will result in utter destruction of their basic resource of wealth namely oil. They know very well they have NO other means to wealth. The problem with Islamic fascists is that they are fighting for imaginary causes with a poisoned psyche full of hatred and malice primarily due to worst kind of religious indoctrination.They are devoid of reason and rationale. The only way to put an end to this is to expose the designs of religious bigots who mislead these youth. No mullah has ever died HIMSELF in a suicide attack. If they are so sure of going to heaven then why don't these guys attempt some of these suicide missions. The only way to turn these unfortunate young men from these misguided ways will need a long-drawn-out education programs and better employment and economic activities for them to call the bluff of those indoctrinating them, to reject these ways of violence. This is difficult yet probably the only path towards peace, to put an end to living in paranoia of fear of terrorist attacks, for all the people of deceloped and developing world.It will involve world leaders getting together with Islamic nations to work out a joint strategy to put an end to this horrendous face of society namely-Terror and Terrorists
2006-08-14 04:25:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by openpsychy 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yes. Hollywood hasn't cast the Actors yet tho, so you'll just have to be patient. Go look at some more videos-for-the-simple-minded, they'll keep you busy till WW ver. 3.0 starts.
2006-08-14 04:33:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by kristycordeaux 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
no because in order to be a "World" war, it has to be affecting ALL nations in the world. In the old days, communism and totalitaranian really affected the world. Well, there's not many "allies" for middle east war forces, so, i don't think so.
2006-08-14 03:45:16
·
answer #8
·
answered by [Tsuniper-X] 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
not as long as the war remains against the fanatics and not against the religion.
2006-08-14 03:44:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by knu 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
We have always been at war with Eurasia.
2006-08-14 04:30:38
·
answer #10
·
answered by geekgoddessoffire 2
·
0⤊
0⤋