English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

21 answers

It isn't by normal people.

2006-08-14 03:12:32 · answer #1 · answered by Left the building 7 · 0 2

Because there is a spiritual connection that takes place every time there is sexual intercourse. You may not know it at the time but you will revisit the emotion at sometime in the future. All energy that goes out comes back. That person is someone's daughter or son or brother or husband. Put yourself in any one of those persons shoes and see how you would feel if the person that having casual sex, was having it with someone you love. Then ask the question to yourself again.
Since sex was invented by God it is considered a private and beautiful thing reserved for married people. It is made beautiful and clean for the purpose of procreation. When people use it like animals in the field do it, kinda makes it more of a lustful self fulfilling thing. Is is about the other person? In casual sex it may be real to one of the parties then the other one gets hurt. In order to just have a sexual fling without any emotion is pure animal lust, and is more like an addiction then the Love that was intended to sanctify the act.

2006-08-14 03:22:23 · answer #2 · answered by happylife22842 4 · 0 1

There are some religions that consider this to be the case.
The common sense "moral" viewpoint that most people would agree with is that " sexual promiscuity" is what should be avoided or restrained by the individual.
The reasons for this is understandable and observable.
Sex is how we project ourselves into the future through children and family. But when misused or abused it carries with it heavy penalities and punishments: nature seems to have intended it this way also.
So the basic moral precept is: Be faithful to your sexual partner.
Lives get ruined by unfaithfulness and the guilt and jealousy in creates in people.
Sex is a big step on the way to happiness and enjoyment of life.
There is nothing wrong with it if it is followed with faithfulness and decency.

2006-08-14 03:40:01 · answer #3 · answered by thetaalways 6 · 0 1

God said so. Would you want a woman with lots of experience to marry for your first time? Or would you want one that had the moral fiber to say no till she was with you on your wedding night? marriage is a committment that is to be for life so how many men do you want to pass the street knowing they had sex with YOUR wife? Could you really have the trust you should knowing she may go to anther any time? See, it just saves a lot of trouble later if you wait till the night of your wedding and then enjoy the gift that was saved just for you. Otherwise, it is like the old saying goes, why buy the cow when you get the milk for free? Why make a committment when you already have all the things a married couple normally share?

2006-08-14 03:16:27 · answer #4 · answered by ramall1to 5 · 0 1

Well without getting into religion... It could be considered immoral because with sex you risk producing a child. Unmarried couples are not always willing or well equipt to bring up a child properly. Therefor, it can be a selfish act, with the risk being to the life of a future child.

2006-08-14 03:13:35 · answer #5 · answered by Capt Weez 2 · 1 1

Intercourse among unmarried people is fornication, and is forbidden by the Bible.
1 Corinthians 6:18 Flee fornication. Every sin that a man doeth is without the body; but he that committeth fornication sinneth against his own body.

2006-08-14 03:13:06 · answer #6 · answered by flyersbiblepreacher 4 · 1 1

To me moral is a higher standard of rules.

We need rules so everyone can be protected.

Having sex without the "marriage commitment" is like driving through red lights. How many times can you ran a red light until you get into an accident.

Think about all those sexually transmitted diseases, and baby abandon cases, and abortion tragedy, now tell me having sex before marriage is a moral thing to do.

2006-08-14 09:13:36 · answer #7 · answered by Wahnote 5 · 0 1

Because sex was intended by creator God to be an expression of love between a husband and a wife, and secondarily as a menas to propogation of the species.

2006-08-14 03:27:56 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Cos if they will hav bastard child, the child has no right upon his/her father.The girl and the child cant do anything if the man leave them.
The child might grow up psychologically poor without the presence of a father

2006-08-14 03:24:20 · answer #9 · answered by fadil z 3 · 0 1

Do not Attach Morality with SEX. It is act of mutual consent between a man and a woman.

2006-08-14 03:18:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Because your body is supposed to be a temple and you are not necessarily treating the temple properly by letting just anyone in. You are supposed to wait for the one.

2006-08-14 11:46:25 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers