it infects the DNA in your t-cells. we've just recently completed the human genome, it'll be awhile before we figure out the protein coding of everything, so don't expect a "CURE" in the near future. they'll be able to delay the virus for longer and longer, but to completely CURE it, not for a long while.
2006-08-09 01:56:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
The official reasoning are these: - the USA won the 'Space Race', so the others just quit - other countries than the USA couldn't do it, due technological and political problems - the USA couldn't do it now due to other focus and political problems Which makes nonsense due: - there are other 'firsts' one can do, like first base, first colony, first anything else - technological and political problems can be resolved, besides if the 'Space Race' is true, then other countries will definetly be persistance enough - other focus and political problems exist before the manned moon flight, what make them can't be dealt with now? A more logical explanation: - the USA did go there, but the locals were upset, maybe more toward the sponsor of the USA than the USA themself. The USA and other sponsored countries were banned until they get a new sponsor - Apollo 12 is a second attempt, but forgiven. Apollo 13 is a third attempt, denied. Apollo 14, 15, 16, and 17 are up to anyone's guest - since the USA, the USSR, and the PRC are sponsored by the same sponsor, in the 70's they all cancel their manned moon flight programs But of course, these are not cnsidered logical if one hold to the thinking that there were no locals on the moon. Plus also hold the thinking that the USA, the USSR, and the PRC are sponsored by the same sponsor. Anyway. It's correct that humans are by default in nature do not want to go to the moon. For hundreds and thousands of years, the moon isn't a place humans want to stay, visit maybe, but not stay. But why did there were attempts in the 60's? Was it due to human nature? Or was it because there's an outside non human sponsor?
2016-03-27 05:04:12
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because HIV changes all the time. It never stays the same. There are alot of diseases that don't have a cure despite the advancement in technology.. the flu doesn't have a cure, the cold doesn't have a cure... the only cure for HIV/AIDS is prevention..
2006-08-09 02:00:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Imani 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
because it is a retrovirus, which means that it is constantly changing---it's not just one type of hiv that needs a vaccine, its hundreds or thousands. The common cold is also a retrovirus. It changes constantly, also why there has never been a cure for the common cold. Each time in your life that you catch a cold, you are actually catching a brand new virus, it just happens to always cause the same type of symptoms.
2006-08-09 02:27:41
·
answer #4
·
answered by P-nuts and Hair-dos 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
I think because the virus attacks the immune system in such a way that it is constantly replicating. Even the most powerful of the anti-retrovirals used as treatment for HIV only slow down the replication but cannot permanently stop it.
2006-08-09 01:56:31
·
answer #5
·
answered by lop 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because it's a virus, just like the common cold. There's no cure for viruses. You can only treat the symptoms.
2006-08-09 02:50:29
·
answer #6
·
answered by j.f. 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
because of mutations of the virus
2006-08-09 02:52:44
·
answer #7
·
answered by sivasage 2
·
0⤊
0⤋