I feed my dogs the raw diet and they are the sweetest most loving dogs. Not a vicious bone in their body. Most vets will tell u this as they do not see the raw diet to be good for them, but in my opinion it is better than all those commercial dog foods that use toxic chemicals and by=products in their dog food. There is good dog foods out there like innova, solid gold, and etc, but the crap sold in the grocery stores and at ur vets office stay away from as they are filled with nothing but fillers and rendered cancerous animal parts.
Raw meat will not make ur dog change, he will just be happier. Cooked is bad, raw is better.
2006-08-07 00:50:25
·
answer #1
·
answered by badgirl41 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
PLEASE READ ALL The egg came first because other animals came before the chicken that had eggs of some kind. One kind are the fish in the seas; fish lay eggs. Another are snakes; snakes also lay eggs. Only if this question was asked as, "Which came first, the chicken or the chicken egg?", would it be a paradox. Sexually reproducing animals also have eggs- the question doesn't specify a type of egg. Dinosaurs had eggs. Darwin's theory; the chicken egg came from a different species. A chicken could not have its genetic material altered during life, so the egg must have evolved and been first. If you take into account the doctrine of evolution, the egg's coming first becomes plausible on the cellular level under perfect circumstances (abundant food and resources). There will be an a-sexual reproduction once the environment becomes unfavorable. The species would then evolve, and a lot of animals have no parental instincts but through evolution some have started to look after their young. An a-sexual reproduction is reproduction in which there is no fusion of male and female sex cells gametes. The egg came first because the chicken descended from a dinosaur, and it laid an egg that was changed from Darwin's theory. The egg came first because a chicken comes from an egg. At whatever point you decide to call the chicken a true chicken, it must have come from an egg. Because the different species before it must have evolved to make a chicken, the egg came first. THE CHICKEN CAME FIRST: Using Literature, the chicken comes first. Using grammar, "the chicken" comes first in the sentence (They come before the words, "the egg".). In a dictionary, the word "chicken" comes before "egg". God created the chicken first. In the seven days that God created the earth, it makes no mention of animal's eggs. Thus, the chicken came first. The chicken came first because, if the chicken didn't come first, there would be no egg or care for it. So, God had to make the chicken first. NEITHER THE EGG NOR THE CHICKEN CAME FIRST: There is no answer.Since the question is a paradox, there is no answer. If the chicken came first, it came from the egg. If the egg came first, then it came from a chicken, and so forth. There is no correct answer that can be proven. It's all theory. Evolution suggests that both chickens and eggs evolved from creatures and "egg-things" you would not recognize to be part of the lineage. (Similar to how, in the very distant past, some molecule[s] that was [were] not what we would call "life" became "life".) That was the beginning. The rooster came first.Neither the chicken or the egg came first. It was the rooster who came first. The egg and the chicken came at the same time.The chicken and the egg are just two different names for the same process or being. It's like water becoming ice is still water, and vice versa.
2016-03-27 01:53:45
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Human food isn't nutritionally balanced for animals. If your Vet is telling you to feed your dog food which is prepared specifically for dogs then listen to him, he's giving it to you straight.
If you Vet is telling you that red meat will change the dogs personality and make him more aggressive then that's a bunch of bunk. That's an "Old Wife's Tale" and is not true. I don't know why you're Vet would say something like that.
2006-08-06 19:43:19
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ellen J 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
The vets know nothing about raw feeding. Make sure any meat you give your dog is uncooked. You can feed them chicken on the bone but ONLY ONLY if it's uncooked. Otherwise the bone can splinter and puncture intestines. My folks feed raw and their dogs are perfectly normal. I remember when they first started feeding, hearing all the hype about the dogs becoming aggressive and the like. Never happened, so don't worry feed raw. It's really the best way.
2006-08-06 19:43:23
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I've heard that no human food is ever good for a dog. If your vet says no, i think you should take his advice. It's not good to make your dog get used to human food, it's just not right. :)
--Rich
2006-08-06 19:27:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by Richard 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Listen to him. The food could be fattening, nutritionly bad, or poisoning. He's a vet, not you!
2006-08-06 19:29:38
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
your dog should be fine, its just not good for dogs to eat human food just like its not to good for us to eat dog food.
2006-08-06 21:52:34
·
answer #7
·
answered by Tiffany 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
i dunno but i neva give my dog chicken or meat since they r salty n salty food makes them hair loss
2006-08-06 19:31:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by mion 3
·
0⤊
0⤋