Plenty of rumours about Israel using chemical weapons in Lebanon. What do you think? Is it the truth or is it a load of rubbish?
2006-08-06 13:56:03 · 23 answers · asked by puggtiracer 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Military
Don't forget - Israel is not subject to any chemical weapon treaties
2006-08-06 14:01:02 · update #1
OK, so Muslims can use chemical weapons, but Israel now can't!...I don't think so!!!! Israel is right to fight against the UNBELIEVERS!!!!
2006-08-07 06:32:13 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Why do we have people on this forum who simply posted 'rubbish' for an answer. that's not exactly enlightening is it?
Okay so why does a country possess Nuclear, chemical and biological weapons and landmines if it has no intention of using them.
Lets hope the whole situation does not escalate to a situation where it will be used.
I know for sure that all the world military powers including Israel have them and are actively against emerging nations like Iran and north Korea from stockpilling them. What hypocrisy.
2006-08-06 14:32:57 · answer #2 · answered by olayinka o 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Rubbish
2006-08-06 14:00:36 · answer #3 · answered by Bob 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Israel use White Phosphorus Bombs and also Napalm, Which is now banned by the Geneva Convention.
The Americans get round this using Napalm but now calling it BLU 51 fire bomb.
Both chemical weapons are used by Israel.
2006-08-07 01:50:06 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Notwithstanding the use of chemical weapons is contrary to international law, I would not put it past the Israelis to use chemical weapons either against the Lebanese or the Palastinians.
2006-08-06 20:35:40 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
It does not make sense. Israel has support of USA (it appears) and if Israel were caught using chemical warfare, they would be in violation of the United Nation agreements, thus losing all support.
2006-08-06 14:01:24 · answer #6 · answered by SpongebobRoundpants 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
It depends what sort of chemical weapons you refer too, In short many weapons rely on horrible chemicals that burn straight through anything such as white and red phos.
Also there are gasses used to clear buildings etc.
2006-08-06 14:12:24 · answer #7 · answered by George Adamson 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I believe it is rubbish, however, I would not doubt that Hezbollah will try to get there hands on some. Israel, would never consider that under this type of threat, that rumor is ridiculous....
2006-08-06 14:01:34 · answer #8 · answered by 345Grasshopper 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
it is genuine hard to disguise the glee in Iran, What are there, one hundred twenty million Iranians? frequently located in the extra genteel northern latitudes. 6 thousand centrifuges whirling alongside taking the 235 and getting the main bang for the dollar. ultimately the super stick. the affection of all of it is the sale and transport of spare nukes to the likes of Sudan. The Peace of the Lord is getting shot crammed with radioactive shrapnel. we ought to nuke or invade? What could Jesus do? Will the tanks of capitalism upward thrust to the challenge and grind those scholars/mullahs/objectives to products till now war can destroy out? we ought to have a negotiated conflict, sparing the planet of harm, yet removing pesky human varieties. 12,000 3-6 magatonners geared in the direction of Iran by ability of another nuke potential. specific we believe them, yet as R.Reagan reported, 'decrease the enjoying cards'.
2016-11-04 00:45:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Israel declared more than once that it will NOT be the first to introduce nuclear power any were. i think it is also stand for chemical warfare
2006-08-07 07:12:55 · answer #10 · answered by zilber 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋