English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2006-08-06 13:09:54 · 28 answers · asked by Big I 1 in Family & Relationships Singles & Dating

28 answers

When you absolutely can't wait to love them, care for them, change their diapers, dote upon them, and be 100% involved with raising them to be the best people they can be.
In other words, when you believe your own life is secondary to theirs.

2006-08-06 13:14:31 · answer #1 · answered by Finnegan 7 · 0 0

there is none. nor are there any ideal circumstances under which to have kids. You can be financially secure today and be filing for bankruptcy next week.

If you're going to have them. now is the time. However, biologically, it's better for a woman to have them before the age of 40, simply because that's then the estrogen starts to spike and dive and the body is not as resilient.

Guys can procreate until they're 80. And then some.......

2006-08-06 20:15:39 · answer #2 · answered by brian k 3 · 0 0

28

2006-08-06 20:13:31 · answer #3 · answered by BoRiQuA_MaMi 5 · 0 0

28

2006-08-06 20:13:17 · answer #4 · answered by pyresim 2 · 0 0

26

2006-08-06 20:13:18 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

I guess it more depends on your maturity, responsibility and financial capability to raise the kids rather than the actual age. My boyfriend and I originally wanted to have kids by the time I was 25 (I'm 24 now), but I now feel that I'm not quite ready to have kids quite yet, mainly because I'm still such a kid myself! We both don't feel quite mature enough yet and are not that financially stable enough yet. Hope you and your girl will have a great future with loving kids!

2006-08-06 20:23:39 · answer #6 · answered by babyface 2 · 0 0

Depends on the individual genetics of the individual having the children. Some people age faster. There is no set answer for this one. Younger is always better as far as energy levels go. YOu have more energy for raising children, but are you mature to be loyal to the responsibility. It is Crazy. Too bad we have to age right?

2006-08-06 20:13:31 · answer #7 · answered by Hi T 2 · 0 0

i know most people think wait untill they are financially secure and settled but honestly couldnt be further from the truth,i believe 17 is great to have a child,physically mentally and emotionally and you can still fufill all your dreams i had my child at 17,waited two years finished school went to university never had baby sitters i worked when my child was 5 i now am 26 with a beach house,brand new car two kids,and live the life i always wanted dreams are so much easier when you start younger

2006-08-06 20:20:27 · answer #8 · answered by treatau 6 · 0 0

31

2006-08-06 20:11:53 · answer #9 · answered by Joe B 5 · 0 0

I don't think that there is a "best age" to have children. The best time to have kids is when you are financially and emotionally stable enough to have them. When you are ready to put someone else's needs before your own. That's the best time to have kids.

2006-08-06 20:14:59 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

well it used to be around 25-ish but since america has gone into a downward spiral I'd say 13 is a good age. It's not like your parents won't help you raise it or anything. And if they don't it's not like you can make the taxpayers of America pay for it. After all we're just 1 big ******** charity case, am I right?

2006-08-06 20:13:59 · answer #11 · answered by zetser 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers