Someone tried to post this yesterday but while the summary turned up, the link was broken.
Try this. What do you think?
http://www.nctimes.com/articles/2006/08/03/news/top_stories/8206191650.txt
2006-08-06
10:14:05
·
6 answers
·
asked by
DAR
7
in
Politics & Government
➔ Immigration
Gokart, when Mexico was asked to pick up the tab and take custody of illegal immigrants in California jails, they didn't even show up to the discussion, and called it racist. The German Swedish and other countries represented had no problem taking jurisdiction. Go figure.
2006-08-06
10:28:07 ·
update #1
yars, I agree, and have written my congressmen, but I only have windmills to tilt at at the moment on that front. Well, windmills and the Senate Bill.
2006-08-06
10:31:48 ·
update #2
Sashie, my understanding is that the reason there is an SPP now is that there was so much opposition to the North American Union concept Bush was forced to back room attempts at a fait accomplis. This issue ballooning so late in his presidential career does not bode well for his worldshaping ideas. For some reason he hasn't brought forward his 'Social security equalization' agreement he signed with Mexico to be approved by Congress, either, and is now engaged in a lawsuit with a seniors group that is complaining that he failed to turn it over after a freedom of information act request. I agree that is the big picture, but each link in the chain can be a set back.
2006-08-06
10:43:55 ·
update #3