Good idea and we could empty out the prisons that way. I like that idea.
2006-08-06 05:31:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by chuck 2
·
4⤊
5⤋
well that question has been asked in every war. I would have to say that 99.9% of the men and women serving are good decent and honorable. They represent what is good with America not bad with America. If we are trying to help other countries don't you think we should put our best foot forward? If we put those you mentioned in there we would have a lot more raping and murdering going on. What would that say about America? My son served over there and he deserved to be protected by people who actually care about each other. Not some thug off the street who only cared about themselves. Besides that the thugs on the street don't want to fight in a war. They have no honor. It's one thing to kill an innocent in a drug buy or a robbery when they are the only ones with guns. It's totally different when someone points a gun at them.
2006-08-06 05:34:52
·
answer #2
·
answered by Stand 4 somthing Please! 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
what are you?a racist?sheesh..iraq was never owned by the US or any other people except themselves.i wonder in which century are u living in by commenting on how we should throw away the bads and the thugs to Iraq.scuz me but that was done ages ago when we still live in the era of not having to know what a jail is.who said the iraqis like to fight.if it wasnt for the US who had triggered this whole disaster by claiming that the iraqis are the real terrorist here, the citizens there wont be having gang-fightings and street bombings.let me ask you this,how was the situation in iraq now as to compared to when it was reigned by their own government?
juz admit it.now it was far worse right?why would you claim the iraqis as illiterates?answer me this,if the US hadnt attacked them,the bulidings there esp the schools there wouldnt have been bombed right?so if the schools were bombed by the western armies,how else would they get to be literated.now thanks to your government,they are left to be illiterated.and how is that fair?
well i'm not blaming you for having that thoughts on the iraqis.the ones who should be blames are Bush,Blair and the medias.They shouldnt be biased to one side and deceive their own citizens.CNN is not 100 percent true and neither is the BBC.i would recommend you to do alittle research on what is really happening to the world before pointing out your thoughts.
2006-08-06 05:38:36
·
answer #3
·
answered by whoa 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
That is the stupidest idea! Iraq is a country filled with innocent people. Your military went in on a 'pre-emptive' strike, which in case you don't know makes the United States the aggressors. How would you feel if another country said "well I think that the US has weapons of mass destruction (which you do by the way), so I think I will go an bomb the stink out of them", and "now that they are in a state of emergency where the hoodlums are overtaking the innocent populations, lets send our dumbest and most criminal people over there to further the damage". Seriously, you need some global perspective before suggesting letting loose your criminals on another country.
2006-08-06 05:30:38
·
answer #4
·
answered by Loulabelle 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
listen. my husband is over there, the last thing we need is a bunch of kids shooting off their guns without a thought in their heads. the media portrays iraq in a light that has little to do with the way things really are and if we want to hold out any hope of improving the situation to a point that we can bring people like my husband home, ideas such as your own must remain hypothetical. if it makes you feel better to fantisize about, by all means go ahead. in the mean time, just keep supporting the troops and their families.
2006-08-06 05:30:38
·
answer #5
·
answered by lighting goddess 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
why does united states of america invade everywhere they set a toe? I dont comprehend why united states of america has defined itself because of fact the "Police'of the international and has to take it upon themselves to punish any soveign united states of america that they only dont like.. What if the tables have been became. there are lots of countries that dont like united states of america.. so what in the event that they only come to a variety to police united states of america and invade united states of america and then carpet bomb (your words) |united states of america reason they dont like the guidelines of yankee government.. A united states of america can not only circulate with reference to the international invading and bombing international places willy nilly reason they sense like it.. You attain what you stitch and sometime all this would come again on united states of america.. the international is slowly getting uninterested in this "im the police of the international" ideal..
2016-12-11 03:59:48
·
answer #6
·
answered by endicott 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Thugs in American streets are just as cowardly as the insurgents... They just don't suicide bomb people, they do drive-bys. Thugs have no sense of purpose to anything higher than keeping other thugs off their turf... all two blocks of it.
2006-08-06 05:29:23
·
answer #7
·
answered by Michael 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's a good idea....it beats the heck out of giving these thugs free room and board!
2006-08-06 05:30:21
·
answer #8
·
answered by gorfette 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
cos it wud be wrong.
why should all the innocents in iraq suffer the USA's badness
but we managed it with australia its still wrong though
2006-08-06 05:29:24
·
answer #9
·
answered by walks_on_water2004 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
Good idea -- however, I have a feeling our guys would be wiped out pretty quickly.
2006-08-06 05:27:32
·
answer #10
·
answered by tsopolly 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
..You can be in the Army w/o a Highschool degree
2006-08-06 05:29:28
·
answer #11
·
answered by DC D 2
·
0⤊
0⤋