How many men are there in the british army?

Answer 1

The British army is scaled for around 112,000 personnel but actual deployable man power is lower due to sickness, people being AWOL, leaving the army etc.

Interestingly enough officially if an armed force drops below 100,000 it stops being an army and becomes a defence force!

Answer 2

Out of interest.... what's the point of this delusion difficulty? Why could every person handicap themselves in a warfare? Why could you no longer use your air pressure and army even as it is your maximum effective asset? no one fights this way. It makes no sense no longer to apply your perfect guns. This difficulty could in no way take position in a actual warfare. the total British military in easy words has round one hundred and ten,000 energetic accountability troops. you're telling me that the British receives to wrestle with their complete ability despite the indisputable fact that the U. S. won't be able to? If i changed into the U. S. area i could deliver significantly better than one hundred,000 adult adult males. the U. S. military has over a million troops. Why in easy words deliver one hundred,000 once you may actual deliver better? Idiotic question. is this only infantry vs infantry? Wars are not fought that way anymore. no one sends one hundred,000 unsupported infantry to wrestle yet another military. What about tanks, automobiles, and different kit? Your question would not supply any information as to what's permitted. you in easy words say equivalent numbers. you do not aspect out something else. If automobiles are allowed the British military does no longer have a danger. the U. S. military has over 8,000 Abrams tanks. The British military in easy words has round four hundred Challenger tanks. The British military could be critically outgunned. The Abrams is a present day tank and is better than a tournament for a British Challenger 2. the U. S. military outguns the British military in each element. even if each area had the same quantity of troops the U. S. forces could nonetheless be better positive equipped.

Answer 3

1 China 2,250,000
2 USA 1,625,852
3 India 1,325,000
4 Dem Ppls Rep of Korea 1,075,000
5 Russia 960,000
6 Rep Of Korea 685,000
7 Pakistan 620,000
8 Iran 540,000
9 Turkey 515,000
10 Myanmar 490,000
11 Vietnam 485,000
12 Egypt 450,000
13 Syria 320,000
14 Thailand 315,000
15 Ukraine 295,000
16 Taiwan 290,000
17 Brazil 285,000
18 Germany 284,000
19 France 259,000
20 UK 206,000
21 Italy 200,000
22 Eritrea 200,000
23 Saudi Arabia 200,000
24 Morocco 195,000
25 Mexico 190,000

Answer 4

In the Army, as opposed to the entire armed forces there are less than 100,000 and the vast majority of those are in support roles.

The actual fighting strength (ie those who would go into action with a rifle or a tank) is less than 30,000.

We have 8,000 deployed in Iraq, 4,000 in Afghanistan, around 4,000 in Germany, 2,000 in Northern Ireland, 1,000 in Cyprus, 1,000 in the Balkans, 500 in the Falklands, 500 in Belize, and the rest on rotation in the UK.

We are seriously under strength to do what we try to do.

Answer 5

It is much more than man power. If you think about it 1 british soldier with no legs and only 1 arm and only 1 finger could wipe an enire continent off the face of the earth if you get what i'm saying.

Answer 6

Way too many, all our good british stock are being killed, still we have the immigrants to make up the numbers. I know 3 lads out in Afghanistan, they are so young and inexperienced, they have just become marines. In the type of war that is being fought over there you need experience, not young lads

Answer 7

As a subaltern in the TA I know says - "The British Army - do more with less!".

RN/RM trained strength of 35,470, or 96.3% of overall requirement (95.1% on 1 April 2005);
• Army trained strength of 100,6201, or 98.81% of overall requirement (98.3% on 1 April 2005);
• RAF trained strength of 46,9002, or 99.2%2 of overall requirement (101% on 1 April 2005);
• RN/RM Volunteer Reserve strength of 3,170, or 81% of overall requirement (69% on 1 April 2005);
• Army Volunteer Reserve strength of 32,150, or 84% of overall requirement (82% on 1 April 2005);
• RAF Volunteer Reserve strength of 1,450, or 65% of overall requirement (67% on 1 April 2005).
• Critical shortage groups remained in all three Services

So, including reservists:

219,760 men and women in the services altogether, with the regular army making up just under half.

Answer 8

someone said 190,000active? when i joined i heard we had 94,000. we are facing shortages because of the war on iraq and afghanistan as resultd in less recruitment which is why you see alot more advertising for the army on british tv

Answer 9

we need more. How about recruiting from H M Gov. Prescott could outgun a squad all on his own........if he sat on them.Cheree Blair could baffle a Batallion with her legal knowledge. Margaret Beckett (Forlorn Sec.), could run down a brigade with her caravan. Phoney Blair could lead them into battle (at 30 paces BEHIND).

Answer 10

That is an Official Secret, don't you know. I've informed the appropriate authorities.