if an Iraqi soldiar killed a family and raped and killed an american girl, would our police arrest him?

Question

I was stationed at nellis AFB in 196-1962 and we were training Iraq and Iran pilots to fly our fighters, then giving their nations our fighters, and they would go home and fight each other. (true) they were at war and could not afford their own planes.
If any of those rats killed a las vegas family and then raped and killed their young daughter, the Las Vegas police would have them in jail and never let them out alive. Why doesn't our government turn that Green guy over to Iraq to be tried for crimes in Iraq. How can we try him here for what he did there? Is Iraq a free country now or not? We cannot have it both ways.

Answer 1

Our police arrest him? all he would have to do was be in the area at the time and people would blame him and send him to jail(if he was lucky enough to make it that far)

Answer 2

Because it's a war crime, I think... sooo, he has to answer to his superiors here... Also, I think he was discharged before the charges came to light for some sort of mental problem... The military found out about the crimes after the discharge from some of the other guys involved... Actually, shouldn't they also be tried? Why do they only get a slap on the wrist and have to stay on base w/ out access to weapons? I'll tell you why: the military is lacking on recruits and commissioning officers, so it's very HARD (go figure) for them to just get rid of their troopps for some minor crimes... My husband is in the Army and they do this all the time. Guys get caught with weed, or are driving under the influence, they beat their wives, and cheat on their spouses (yes, infidelity is actually against the law if you are an officer). The excuse, not enough recruits, and he's a "good soldier, or officer" which is hard to come by. Go figure... anyway, mental defect or not, I hope that guy (and any other idiot who breaks the law anywhere) gets what he deserves... And to answer your question, yes, an Iraqi soldier would get arrested... but he'd get a harsher sentence than the American guy... it seems that the whole mental thing is always the excuse for American perps... but if it's an Iraqi, my, he is just a "blood thirsty terrorist"... the hypocrisy is ironic...

Answer 3

The government is more interested in covering up these crimes and they should turn him, and the rest, over to the Iraqi's! That is why the Iraqi's want them turned over!!

Actually, they should be turned over to the world court for Crimes against Humanity, which is where Bush is going after he gets out of the white house!

Answer 4

If the tale is precise, the jury used the stresses of conflict as a mitigator, to not impose lack of existence. Pathetic. each and every of the squaddies in contact, volunteered to serve in the military. besides, some ninety 9.9% of all wartime squaddies by some ability stay away from such terrible habit. All of those squaddies, together, planned this terrible crime. What, did all the squaddies, together, all right away have some variety of conflict psychotic damage that required they plan and then carry out this variety of criminal offense? it really is absurd on its face. certain, it turned right into a lack of existence penalty series of crimes. Tragic and unhappy, made extra so by using the tragedy of the sentence.

Answer 5

Killed an american girl over here? Possibly, but both ways I'm sure the military police would get em.

Answer 6

Here here, because the USA goverment thinks that all other counties are not trust wrothy to try Amcerians. He would be sentrence to that of a war crime.

Answer 7

Yes

Answer 8

As a local historian, I can tell you that probably the case would go unsolved, and the perpetrator would return to his county of origin.

Answer 9

well dur an iraq soldiar did get arrested because that reason stupid!

Answer 10

unfortunately might is right.....