English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

13 answers

Israel has the right to defend itself. They are not the ones who decided to launch the rockets and kidnap soldiers. I choose Israel. Unfortunalty it looks like were gonna have both.

2006-07-06 15:50:54 · answer #1 · answered by nicole 3 · 0 0

For those Israeli haters who seem to be too stupid to remember...the Israelis left Gaza at least a year ago...so technically the Israelis were giving the Palestinians back their land (the West Bank has yet to be given but eventually they would if the Palestinians just stop acting like that Iranian mo'fo who keeps on saying that Israelis should be massacred or something to that effect) but then some poor Israeli soldier got kidnapped (it doesnt really matter what end of the border he was in guys, he was still KIDNAPPPED). And now the Israelis want him back. The Israelis however are obviously overreacting with their use of missiles, tanks and bombs to rescue their soldier...(personally though i would prefer sniper teams or their equivalent of Delta Force do the job, much more quiet and cost-effective than tanks). As for North Korea...they have nukes + missiles...and they have a leader who wont hesitate to use/threaten force to get anything from money to legitimacy. Choosing between rescuing a soldier and threatening the world with Armaggedon (or a reasonable facsimile) then Id have to go with the Israelis then. This does not mean that both are good...its just that one is concievably worse than the other. Bad news is we will have to deal with both of them.

2006-07-06 23:45:48 · answer #2 · answered by betterdeadthansorry 5 · 0 0

I would choose N. Korea with no missiles and Israel without the need to go into Gaza.

2006-07-06 22:52:26 · answer #3 · answered by TrippingJudy 4 · 0 0

Israel isnt going to leave until they have their soldier.
Id hate to be palestinian if he's dead.
Theyre using great restraint considering that every palestinian in that area could have already been killed.
Now i see that the moron UN has a resolution demanding that the Israelis leave.
Is it any wonder why theyve ignored these Un resolutions.
If they obeyed them, Israel would be extinct by now.
All the palestinians have to do is give Israel their soldier back
Its very simple.
Except when youre dealing with COWARDS.
oooo We took their soldier and now theyre shooting at us
Make them stop UN
The UN is their Mommy.
Theyre nothing but little punks.
They like to pick fights
But they dont like when they get their A$$ES kicked.
Run to Mommy little punks.

2006-07-06 23:04:28 · answer #4 · answered by snakeman11426 6 · 0 0

Israel over Korea, hands down.

2006-07-06 22:55:07 · answer #5 · answered by marimbaman 2 · 0 0

I think Israel stole Palestian land and now they are finding any excuse not to give it back . Why not support the other side give them aid too make it fair for both people not just one . Israel acts very much like a terroist but with US guns and tanks paid for by the tax payers. Kill thousands for one man . thats real smart .

2006-07-06 23:05:40 · answer #6 · answered by unreal250 2 · 0 0

Israel because it has been trying to defend themselves since they were alloud to return to Israel. The Arabs have been killing them left and right and claim that they are the ones that are helpless and that it is their country.
History shows that there never was a country called Palistine but then again historian rewriters claim different.

2006-07-06 23:45:14 · answer #7 · answered by fatboysdaddy 7 · 0 0

Israel does not have much of a choice. Besides, the Israelis are remarkably restrained considering the Palestinian provocations.

2006-07-06 23:20:01 · answer #8 · answered by MikeGolf 7 · 0 0

Don't be a hate-monger.

Israel is reacting to attacks from the terrorists in Gaza. Kim Jung Il is just flexing his muscles and threatening to kill us all.

2006-07-06 22:51:06 · answer #9 · answered by Karl the Webmaster 3 · 0 0

It is quite easy to choose neither and be against both.

Your point holds very little water. Just because you are against one, doesn't necessarily mean you support the other. They are not opposites.

2006-07-06 22:58:17 · answer #10 · answered by C Bass 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers