English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Or is it possible that people in biblical times did have more ape like features than modern day man?

2006-07-06 13:08:37 · 16 answers · asked by Professor Chaos386 4 in Society & Culture Religion & Spirituality

16 answers

Oh yeah! We are still apes!

2006-07-06 13:11:56 · answer #1 · answered by swt 2 · 1 1

ok first of all yes they contradict each other! in every way possible. the bible says that "God created the heavens and the earth and all that in them is". God created us in his image, so how the people look then is how they look now. and to Vin. Evolution is NOT scientific and can NOT be observed today, its a religion, you have to believe it and have faith that it happened. To be scientific it has to be observable and repeatable and noone has observed anything evolving into something else and they cant make it happen either. They have tried. To be honest the creation theory cant be observed either. But we NEVER see anything becoming something else. If a dog mates with a dog the result is a dog. nothing else.

2006-07-06 13:32:19 · answer #2 · answered by kermit324 1 · 0 0

the real international, as people inspect and learn about it, needs to by some ability be reconciled with the made-up issues that folk were presented as a lot as believe and to remember upon emotionally. for a variety of of folk, setting up those issues together isn't ordinary - to assert the least. maximum persons now not believe that the earth is flat or that thunder and lightning are the wrath of a supernatural being - even if a lot of folk nevertheless believe that AIDS suits into that latter type. As we come across out issues (by using the techniques of technological know-how) that conflict with previous beliefs, someone has 3 concepts: a million. Throw out the former beliefs. 2. Throw out the hot concepts. 3. by some ability reconcile both in a unmarried's ideas. many human beings have outfitted their finished lives on an emotional framework derived from the bible, and to them (to boot as to others who understand little about technological know-how), it curiously makes the most experience to consider conflicting concepts to be lies, conspiracies, communist plots, islamist plots, or although,

2016-11-01 08:21:23 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

2 websites to checkout.

Best Creationism website i've found:
http://www.answersingenesis.org/

Best Evolutionism website i've found:
www.origins.org/

Check them both out.

Evolutionists will usually say no, as long as the theory of evolution is used to interperet the bible, taking the guts out of Genesis.
Creationists will usually say yes, as the whole point of creation is that it was created by God, and the whole point of evolution is that you don't need God to create, and can justify that he doesn't exist.

You will find that Adams sons were good farmers, their sons built cities, their sons created music and metal working and their sons knew how to build ships (they never asked Noah what he was building, but why he was building a boat on dry land...). So the scientific advancement was rapid, so i don't think that they were apelike.

2006-07-06 13:25:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

If you think about the lack of nutrients during periods of famine, and the birth defects that would resultingly happen, it would make more sense to have isolated incidents of people who were disfigured, or at least easier to imagine that than species randomly evolving into new species, particularly since 99.9% of mutations are negative for the creature and typically result in the natural abortion of the fetus.

2006-07-06 13:17:01 · answer #5 · answered by Heather A 2 · 0 0

Aren't there two different versions of creation in the Bible, that contradict eachother?

2006-07-06 13:29:11 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

grrrrr........don't you people get it yet? When the same scientist come up with "Lucy" and how "it" lived and acted and behaved....and then find out it's only a pigs tooth.....how in the hell are you going to trust anything they have to say. Sure, they might have made some observations....but they came up with the most absurd conclusions.....i.e. Lucy.....or are we going to conveniently forget about that?!?

2006-07-06 13:22:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

it means everyone has a theory but no one can prove a thing beyond a shadow of a doubt. we live life on others opinions theories and guessing.

2006-07-06 13:14:29 · answer #8 · answered by Savage 7 · 0 0

Absolutely they contradict each other,. We have skulls from 6,000 years ago, in fact entire bodies, and they are not monkey like.

2006-07-06 13:12:59 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Of course it contradicts.

2006-07-06 13:11:54 · answer #10 · answered by TheAnomaly 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers