why do jews deny the fact that they demanded the romans to kill jesus and yet say the romans killed jesus?

Answer 1

who killed Jesus? my answer is I did. You did. All us sinners did. He died becuase of our sins. The romans want to say it was the jews fault and the jews want to say it was the romans. It was all of us. Jesus came to earth to die for our sins and thats what he exactly did. Jersuelam count down is an exact book that elaborates on the whole topic. It points out verses specifically in the bible that back up questions asked about the jews and the war that is going on rigth now and what is to come of the jews and the world who turn their back on his people.

Answer 2

Let's try this one more time. Some hundreds of years AFTER the death of Jesus, Romans had come to be the leaders and caretakers of "Christianity" - in short, it was their baby. Does it surprise anyone that when they ordered the creation of the "New Testament" the Romans came out as the nice guys who merely "gave in" to the Jews? How likely was it that the leaders of the (Roman) church would admit that their own kind had killed the savior, the son of god?

And by the way, what exactly would've stopped the Jews from whacking Jesus all by themselves if they were so inclined? (Not a thing.) And the Sanhedrin? Puleeze! A mere Roman rubber stamp.

Lastly, did you know our nice Roman guy Pilate fell into disgrace with his boss because he was such a a cruel bastard - not even the roman emperor could put up with his murderous ways and fired him.

Answer 3

The romans killed jesus at the request of the Hebrew priests who saw him as a threat to their new found power from the romans. Modern Jews had nothing to do with Jesus or the Hebrews of that time, at all, so in fact they did not have anything to do with the crucification of Jesus.

Answer 4

The Romans finished him for treason. He become deliberately set up to get stuck by using the Jews. The Romans motivations were that claiming to be king is problematic the authority of Caesar and they might have none of that. The Jews motivations were understanding that if Jesus starts a rebellion, the Romans would ruthlessly cull it and overwhelm each and each and every of the Jews interior the section thoroughly. when I say the Jews I propose the Jewish leaders of that factor, not the rebellious followers of Jesus, who were also Jews. heritage proved them accurate, that is strictly what befell interior the Maccabees rebellion.

Answer 5

Jews (the religion, not the race) don't take the gospels at face value like Christians do.

They typically assume that Jesus was a rebel rouser who was executed by Rome for insurrection. I think this is nothing more than a speculation really, as there is no historical evidence of any quality to support it.

Answer 6

The Roman leader, Pilate, could have said "no" to their demands. In fact, he did at first, before changing his mind.

Some Jews were responsible for His death, true. But most other Jews were not -- and many of them were His friends and they believed in Him.

Answer 7

There's no evidence (I mean real evidence) that the Jewish people were involved in the supposed death of Yeshua ben Yosef and in all probability they weren't. There is no logical reason why Jewish leaders would have demanded his death.

<
Concerning Jesus' executioner, Pontius Pilate, we have a considerable body of data that contradicts the largely sympathetic portrayal of him in the New Testament. Even among the long line of cruel procurators who ruled Judea, Pilate stood out as a notoriously vicious man. He eventually was replaced after murdering a group of Samaritans: The Romans realized that keeping him in power would only provoke continual rebellions. The gentle, kindhearted Pilate of the New Testament—who in his "heart of hearts" really did not want to harm Jesus is fictional. Like most fictions, the story was created with a purpose. When the New Testament was written, Christianity was banned by Roman law. The Romans, well aware that they had executed Christianity's founder—indeed the reference to Jesus' crucifixion by the Roman historian Tacitus is among the earliest allusions to him outside the New Testament—had no reason to rescind their anti-Christian legislation. Christianity's only hope for gaining legitimacy was to "prove" to Rome that its crucifixion of Jesus had been a terrible error, and had only come about because the Jews forced Pilate to do it. Thus, the New Testament depicts Pilate as wishing to spare Jesus from punishment, only to be stymied by a large Jewish mob yelling, "Crucify him." The account ignores one simple fact. Pilate's power in Judea was absolute. Had he wanted to absolve Jesus, he would have done so: He certainly would not have allowed a mob of Jews, whom he detested, to force him into killing someone whom he admired.

Crucifixion itself, a Roman form of execution, was forbidden by Jewish law because it was torture. Some 50,000 to 100,000 Jews were themselves crucified by the Romans in the first century. How ironic, therefore, that Jews have historically been associated with the cross as the ones who brought about Jesus' crucifixion.

Is there a Jewish consensus on how Jews are to regard Jesus? Perhaps not, but in recent decades many Jewish scholars have tended to view him as one of several first- and second-century Jews who claimed to be the Messiah, and who attempted to rid Judea of its Roman oppressors. However, almost no Jewish scholars believe that Jesus intended to start a new religion. Were Jesus to return today, most Jews believe, he undoubtedly would feel more at home in a synagogue than a church. An increasing number of Jewish scholars believe that Christianity's real founder was another first-century Jew, Paul.
>

Answer 8

Why do you use the bible as an instrument of hate?

After all, that is what you're doing. "Who killed Jesus?" The answer to that question will no doubt cause animosity to the guilty, be they Jew or Roman. Either way, you're just spreading hate.

Is that what your God wants?

Answer 9

What are you really trying to say? If Jesus came to earth to live among us today and preached about his Father, about sin, about morality, you can be sure the mobs would be out to stone and crucify him. No matter, so-called Christians, Jews, Muslims and the ACLU would be suing him. We would accuse him of placing a guilt trip on us and do whatever we could to shut him up and let us go on living as we are.

Are you aPalistinian? Do you resent USA for being Israel's ally? What's really going on?

Answer 10

Does God deny the fact that he sent Jesus with the sole purpose of being tortured and dying on the cross?