What would intrigue you to sit down and have a conversation about the gospel with a Christian? What makes?

Question

the idea most skeptical and reluctant to sit down and talk about the gospel with a Christian?

Christians - this could be a learning experience of how to make yourself more able to approach a non-Christian and talk with out being over bearing.

Please, do not be sarcastic in your answers, I'd really like to know what the turn off's are and how to potentially correct that.

Answer 1

I have many times, I grew up in church. But I always ran into a brick wall with my most imprtant questions being unanswerable except by some brain-dead style cookie cutter responce of " God has a reason for everything" and "take it on faith, and pray" Those are not real answers people. Try my fav question on for size....." what happens to a woman who is pregnant during the rapture? does she have the baby on her way through the clouds, does the fetus dissappear? Or is there a full-grown adult materialized beside her?What about other babies and children who died, are they children for all eternity?" no one can answer my questions. And, I'm not being sarcastic this time, i swear.

Answer 2

Well the biggest turn off for me is that instead of it being a rational and calm conversation someone is bound to push too hard and then the other person feels trapped and lashes out like a dog backed in a corner. Then it gets ugly. I find that most non-Christians are more willing to adapt their beliefs based on such conversation and are able to change their minds on some aspects. But Christians for the most part are more unwilling to reciprocate this. Instead of listening to the other person and thinking about what they are saying in comparison to their beliefs, they instead try and twist it around so that they don't have to consider any validity to the others claims. Most times I'd rather beat my head into a wall than discuss religion with a Christian.

Answer 3

This would assume that a non-Christian would take the time to learn more about Christianity. Keep in mind that if someone is not a Christian, there's a reason for it.

For most, they don't see evidence that Christianity is the correct religion. You can be as flowery as you like about how life is beautiful and how it's too much of a coincidence to not have God involved, but you can make the same argument about Allah, Ra, or Baphomet. In fact, if you sit down and make those arguments only about God and not the other gods, then you are being intellectually dishonest. There is no evidence that points to the Christian god as the one being responsible.

Now, if you were able to perform the miracles along the lines of Jesus, then you may be able to persuade someone. But remember, this is the 21st century. Technology is a wondrous thing. After all, David Copperfield made the Statue of Liberty "disappear." It's easy to fake a miracle.

And even if you did possess magical powers, how do I know you're not an evil trickster? If someone performed miracles in the name of Allah, do I know it was Allah? What if it was really Satan luring me away? Even a miracle isn't assured.

So, what turns me off of Christianity? There's no reason for me to believe in it. How can you correct that? Get me a meeting with God so he can tell me himself. A mere mortal like yourself has no authority to speak on his behalf. And if I turn out to be wrong, then I'll deal with him in the afterlife and ask him to explain why he created me to doubt him when he presents no evidence of himself.

Answer 4

extra human beings take a seat and study how the NT got here to be, than actual arise with reliable solutions. Take your timeline. multiple the NT ought to, certainly, were written early in the second one century. Your claims that "plenty" changed into written in "properly into" the second one century are really questionable. Even the merely excellent-documented overdue addition in the completed NT, John 7:fifty 3-8:11 (the "pericope adulterae"), looks probably to were a fix of suppressed textual content really than a fourth-century addition. we've were given beforehand expenses of similar fabric in gospels which have not survived. The astonishing element is how a lot fairly undesirable wondering can get revealed, so long because it argues adversarial to the Bible as we've it. The Jesus Seminar editors were fullyyt able to contradicting themselves in a pair short sentences, because any attack on canonical variations changed into pleased with them, in spite of consistency. yet you're astounding about "thousands of variations"; I heard between the extra acceptable editors communicate in this a lengthy time period lower back. He said that minor transformations (different orders in lists, for instance) are endemic in the Greek manuscripts. Cataloguing them is a significant attempt. although, the glaring question is what vast difference that makes to the content fabric.

Answer 5

The Gospels are the first four books of the New Testament. Called such because they witness to Jesus. To call the rest of the Bible by this term will give us false witness. Perhaps thats why so many are turned off to learning about Gods love and accepting his rule in their lives?

Answer 6

I personally enjoy the debate and agree there is no better way to learn more for providing every seeker an answer. Of course I am coming from a Christian perspective.

That's why I love it here so much.

Answer 7

It would be "intriguing" to sit down and have a conversation about the gospel with an 18-year virgin with a huge rack in church.

"Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but they are commanded to be under obedience, as also saith the law, and if they will learn anything, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for woman to speak in the church."
1Corinthians 14:34-35

Answer 8

I think conversations (non judgmental ones) are good to see things in a different perspective. Some people go about it wrong and say this way is right, even if it is. This is pushy and does exactly that pushes. You have to be willing to listen and be patient. then they will be willing to listen to your side. Don't let the defensive wall get between the person you are talking to.

Answer 9

i love to talk about the gospels, i love to talk religion. but most people, especially christians, are afraid to talk about religion in any meaningful way. what i mean is, they just want to talk about how we should listen to the gospel, but when it comes to weird things in the bible, satan, ideas about reincarnation, science, and all that in light of religion, they don't want to talk about it.

so, we can talk about the gospel. we can talk about jesus. but just know that i also want to talk about religion as a whole. i like christians who aren't afraid to talk about satanism. who can look at the bible through both religious and historical eyes. who can talk about the story of genesis in terms of what it shows us about humanity.

so what i ask for is an intelligent human being who is going to listen to my ideas, because while i am an atheist, i do respect your religion very much.

Answer 10

one major turn off is telling the person who you are sitting with that they are going to hell with out jesus. you could explain that in a story from the bible and gradually add more and more things about heaven and hell and how and what their lives are going to end up like........you can't just throw it all in their face at one time, you have to process it slowly in a way tghey won't get bored but moreintersested.....

god bless!!

:-)