If a nuclear conflagration is started by Kim Jong III attacking Japan, then we him , then China us, then Russia China, would that kill more people than a possible terrorist attack from Osama Bin Laden and his boys?
Maybe we should shift priorities now and bring our boys home to protect America and let Iraq tale care of its own problems.
We may need all the national guard we can muster to deal with aftermath of nuclear attack. just a thought.
2006-07-06 05:16:02 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Military
The fear of massive weapons is what started the Iraq war.
When they refused to allow weapons inspectors in Iraq, President Clinton sent in troops. The fear of a madman, Saddam, having nuclear weapons started the war. Now N Korea has a madman that we did not stop before he had nuclear weapons. And No, he did not get them under the Bush Presidency. In the 1980s they started using their nuclear power ability to try to make weapons. My son is a US Army Ranger not a National Guard. He signed up knowing what that meant. It is so selfish to only worry about us not other countries. Can we truly stand alone with no Allies by not worrying about other countries?
Iraq & Afghanistan allow us closer to North Korea & China if we need to lauch & protect ourselves.
2006-07-06 05:31:22 · answer #1 · answered by Wolfpacker 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I don't how old you are. But we can't bring people back to protect us. If we get nuked we want our guys in some other place. We will kick the north Koreans butt. Kim Jong is already dead and he knows it. That's why he makes all these threatening moves. He wants our help...food for his people so they don't revolt. You are living in fantasy a world if you think we could just pick up the pieces with the national guard. They are people just like us. They are good people but they won't be able to clean up a mess after a nuke. Osama will most likely throw one of those at us. Terrorist are our problem...not Kim. I don't mean to say anything to make you mad. You are good person.
2006-07-06 13:05:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Nuclear war is suicide for all of the world and nobody should have the power to decide suicide on our behalfs a kick in the nuts would be in order to anyone who thought so. I think I would rather hang out with terroists than with any one in control of nuclear weapons I would trust them more .
2006-07-06 12:22:59 · answer #3 · answered by david 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No rational person, or Government, sees nuclear weapons as a tool of war. They are a detterent. Certainly they are dangerous, but not in the way you speak of.
2006-07-06 12:20:54 · answer #4 · answered by derajer 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
tell me who controls the nuclear weapons we need to watch out for?
2006-07-06 12:25:28 · answer #5 · answered by Lfeata 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If we were worried about number casualties and not freedom we would be a british colony and not America.
2006-07-12 04:52:38 · answer #6 · answered by keep_up_w_this 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't really know if I fear either. I never really noticed that ntil now.
2006-07-06 12:23:43 · answer #7 · answered by ~mary~ 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
INDEED YES WE SHOULD.IS IT HAVE BEEN SAID OVER AND OVER AGAIN.WE ALL WILL DIE IF THIS HAPPENS AND I DONT KNOW ABOUT YOU BUT I DONT FEEL LIKE DYEING TODAY
2006-07-07 09:33:39 · answer #8 · answered by DIDDY 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋