If we have to strike N. Korea, is it Bush's fault?

Question

We can't be thankful to Bush for his rigorous defense of this nation, but what if he does nothing, and we are bombed by a nuke?
Will librials blame him for being lax?

Answer 1

Rail may know how to spell check....but what about stringing together a coherent declarative sentence?

Answer 2

It is more a China problem then ours.
If we try to make them stop by force we start a war people die.If we get China to go along with us on sanctions China is a Country that N.Korea dose fear and respects
they will listen to China more then the U,S,A

But it is not President Bush 's fault for this Country hatting us they never stopped hatting the U.S.A .
We never signed a peace treaty so in all actuality we are still at War with N.Korea so the blame would have to go to pulling out of the war or it is the fault of every other President after that for not stopping the N.Korea from getting to be the third largest military and having a Nuke.

Answer 3

The problems with North Korea are not limited to the USA. The majority of the global nations condemn the missile launchings and are initiating their own responses.

My difficulty with this administration is that they have taken it upon themselves to police the world and ignore everyone else's input or attempts to work through the issues. Our influence in the UN is virtually nil now and our allies dwindling. Maybe the USA politicians should be more willing to work with the UN instead of against it. Until they do Bush will be blamed for most things...and not just by the "liberals." In case you haven't been noticing many Republicans are openly disagreeing with Bush and his decisions.

Answer 4

9/11 replaced into the fault of our regulation enforcement and intel amenities, they were so being conserving their personal jurisdictions and hiding issues from one yet another that they couldn't be afflicted to actual seem after the country. Clinton tried, and replaced into blocked through the GOP Congress from beginning alterations that would want to nicely have prevented it, so as that one is the GOPs fault if not Bush's in my opinion. North Korea has been openly proclaiming it really is purpose to develop right into a nuclear united states of america for years, Bush knew that and ignored it, merely as he ignored the nuclear application in Iran, in his attempt to exhibit Iraq right into a U.S. puppet regime contained in the middle East. He destroyed our economic equipment and our global status as well as any credibility we had as an ethical and merely human beings. The GOP is claiming that the very incontrovertible actuality that Bush's mess is more beneficial than everyone envisioned and could take way longer to clean up than Obama would have probably envisioned proves that he, Bush, did not make any blunders in any respect.

Answer 5

That is the eternal risk my friend...If Bush preemptively strikes North Korea and does it stupidly then yes the USA will look bad. If the USA does nothing and ends with a nuke in say Denver then yes the Democrats will pounce on him for his stupidity and being lax. There is a risk with every action...but risks must not paralze people into doing nothing.

Answer 6

I am not a Bush fan but as an ex-Army brat I do support my troops and even my government (to an extent, the majority did elect this guy) Korea seems to me to be using all the anti American jargon to get themselves into to world spotlight for some reason. I don't think that European countries will allow N Korea to get too far with this missile crap because after all they would be more at risk than us even if it is our "Word War" at the moment. I seriously do not think that other nations closer to N Korea will stand by and allow themselves to be come targets. Be it "practice" or otherwise.

Answer 7

Look....Kim Jong Il has been a problem for a long time so this is nothing new...it's just that now he appears as more of a threat to others and the U.S. than he did before. Something needs to be done but what that is remains to be seen. Bush knew Kim Jong Il was a problem since day one...it's just he chose not to do anything about it. Instead he decided to start a war in Iraq when most people in this country, myself included, saw North Korea as more of a threat than Iraq. I think before they commit troops or bomb North Korea, they need to sit down and try to talk it out. Sure Kim Jong Il might not be open to negotiations, he hasn't in the past, but maybe we could convince them to come to the table and hash things out.

Answer 8

This is honestly a no win situation for us. If we do nothing, we may end up loosing precious ties with other nations that are against N. Korea. Or worse get struck anyway. If we impose economic sanctions against N. Korea we aren't teaching them anything. The people it will hurt are the powerless poor people of the country. Either way we look like Jack@sses. I think that no matter what we do, there are going to be those that are not happy with the decision. So, either way we are screwed...

Answer 9

Sure , Blame Bush
All the libasses think he's to blame for everything from the forty day flood to the kennedy assassination anyway so
What will a little thing like this matter.
Edit
Kerry nuke them?
That is hilarious
He'd be in the White House Bomb shelter by now.

Answer 10

Right and we go to North Korea and then China comes to get us!!Is this what the 3rd World War will be? I haven't heard anyone blaming Bush for North Korea. That dictator has been hated by many for many years but there isn't any communication. It's like they have their own planet - a sad one. But I don't like Bush. I just don't think this has anything to do with him (THIS TIME).

Answer 11

Firstly tell me why you are not thankful to Bush. What was his mistake in 9/11. Nothing. who had thought that they can do such a henious crime.

Secondly, I don't think that Bush did anything wrong in attacking Afganistan or Iraq. You will have to show your power if anybody is not listening to.

I would be in favbour of Bush even if he attacks Iran and N Korea. Atleast He has the reason now.