Is the US Electoral College really democratic?

Question

Is the US Electoral College a democratic way to elect a president or he (or she) should be elected by the majority of the popular vote?

Answer 1

The electoral college is outdated and ought to be abolished. Too many people think the U.S. constitution is a perfect document; it is not. It is an amazing document, especially for the time it was written in, but it was written over 200 years ago- things have changed a lot. The argument that it gives smaller states more leverage is also suspect- the reality is that a candidate only has to win about a dozen of the most populous states by a thin margin to get enough electoral votes. In other words, the smaller-population states can be hurt by the system as much as helped. Also, look at the issues in Florida and Ohio in the last two elections- one state with a big population basically decided each election, and the results in both cases were debatable. Partisan election officials decided when and how to count the votes.

Answer 2

I do not think that the president should be elected by popular vote.

The Electoral College is "democratic" in the same sense that the US is.

We are a Constitutional Republic and the Electoral College is definitely a republican way to elect a president.

If it was just popular vote people would only run in NY and LA where they could get the most bang for their buck and not even visit "Fly over country"

Answer 3

I don't think that in this age the electoral college should be the end measure of an election. It had it's place when it was harder to get data, when information was transferred with those ponies and such. But now realistically, we can see almost real time what the popular vote is, plus we are supposed to be much more informed so we the "people" don't need to be represented by proxy. It should now be adjusted to be in step with the times. It would take an amendment, if I remember my Schoolhouse Rocks correctly.

Answer 4

If we did not have the Electoral College then Big Population States would be in total control over who is our President whereas with the Electoral College the Smaller Population States can have their say too.

Answer 5

we are a Republic. The States make their own guidelines and the states each and each and every have representation. you could vote for different activities if there is someone on the pollfrom different activities. some states enable you to position in writing in a candidate. maximum states do not make you vote interior the conventional in accordance to the way you're registered. each and each and every state determines those guidelines. The electoral college is meant to solid its votes in accordance to the widespread vote interior the state. Our guidelines are in holding with community authorities, not a imperative authorities. If people interior of a state do compared to their guidelines, they could grow to be lively in getting them replaced by skill of their state legislations. A president can lose an election even although they have extra widespread votes with the aid of inhabitants of each and every state. we've an section representative authorities, not a imperative authorities almost about elections. the reason we do not have extra activities is because they don't have adequate help from the widely used public. No different reason.

Answer 6

I say popular vote is the way to go. Why layer a system with more and more buffers?
We are not a Democracy but a Republic, as such Americans can not expect all things to be done democratically or by popular vote.

Answer 7

NO NO NO. In the USA, you are only aloud to have 2 parties!!!
If another political party try his way out, this 2 big ones join force and smash them out! This is not democracy at all, how could only 2 parties represent all the thinking of a great nations like USA?