If Korea launched a nuclear missile at the U.S. and we were able to shoot it down. Do you feel???

Question

Do you feel this act of agression would give us the right to retaliate with a nuclear strike of our own?

Answer 1

I believe we would retaliate with an immediate and swift invasion before a nuclear retaliation. But if we were hit with a nuclear bomb, we would be more likely to go straight to nuclear. It should be much like the US did to Iraq, just with more force and more big bombs to filter out the fighters so the US won't lose too many troops. The reason for this is because if we stopped the nuke from hitting the US, and we bomb them with nukes, nothing can be done with the land and it is inhumane by the world's standard. But if we invade, we can have definite control of a region in Asia. Since their long range missile failed in it's test flight on the 4th, it will take them time to build another and even longer to build an arsenal. Then it will take more time to equip them with nuclear war heads. Hopefully there can be some type of resolution forced by all nations before anything major happens.

Just because the US supposedly stopped production and advancements in intercepting missiles, it doesn't mean they really did. The star wars program may be in working order. Only the people that need to know, know the truths of what the US is capable of.

Answer 2

No.

We have the bombs and ability to conventional blast them back to the stone age where they need to rediscover fire.

South Korea (USA Allies) would appreciate the lack of nuclear fallout.

China (Not an Ally) would appreciate no nuclear fallout enough to become an ally.

Win win situation. North Korea would be a non radio active parking lot. Build a Disney World or something in it's place.

Answer 3

we've spent billions of money on anti-missile protection. regrettably, those in the comprehend all admit that that is extra of a bluff than a truth. At this element we've difficulty hitting a ballistic missile even even as that missile has a homing gadget on it. Given the low tech missiles that Korea has, lets have a danger if we throw each and every thing at it ... assuming their missiles ought to even make it this a techniques.

Answer 4

Yes, and I also believe it would be absolutely necessary for the well being of this country and all other countries. BUT, North Korea can't even keep a missile in flight for over 35 seconds, so for now there is nothing to be concerned about.

Answer 5

HELL NO!!!! The United States is the only Nation to ever use a Nuke. We used two of them on Japan in 1945. It is questionable that we had the right or need to drop the bombs, but we did.
We killed tens of thousands of innocent people, and because of this history, and common sense, we can never us a Nuke again.
What we need to do as quickly as possible in this crazed world is start nuclear disarming treaties, summits and every means at our disposal to talk the World into disarming before the next nuke goes off, which may happen at any time now.
And it may well go off inside of America.

Good Questions! Thanks.

Answer 6

I think Bush would totally retaliate, not sure if it would be a nuke as well, but he'd definatley rain hell on them. As I would too! I'd be sooo pissed that everyone would have to strap me to a chair! (after a few minutes of struggling I'd get tired though... ^-^) I think that if N Korea did that then it would only prove their leader's stupidity, I say execute the bastard. I'm the kind of person who goes after the leader of insanity, instead of making the people suffer. I have to admit, I'm not well educated about N Korea's people's feelings about us, but I don't think they should all be destroyed. If only we could iliminate all of the world's destructive morons...

Answer 7

We would definitely have the right to retaliate, but would it be wise or beneficial to mankind, our planet or even our environment to do so? I don't think so. I hope the government can find another solution.. like invading them and relieving them of any nuclear capabilities.

Answer 8

Actually yes i feel that we should nuclear strike them in retaliation, because they are a communist country they wouldnt hesitate to shoot more missles, they might even join up with Russa to get us good.

Answer 9

it shouldn't matter the U.S. on what other countries are doing, that's their problems. you don't see other countries getting involve in the issues of the United States. In my case the United States should stop getting into other countries business and that way they can stop a war from happening. now, with the war that they have had all they done is lose soldiers. but that doesn't matter to them because they don't know the soldiers or because isn't their family. all they care about is them making money, or land.

Answer 10

I can't simply say that one has the right to murder millions of human beings..a retaliation would be necessary but an eye for an eye wouldn't work if we didn't lose anyone. However, this admin probably wouldn't hesitate to hit em hard.