...when he himself spoke strongly against it?
ACTS 16: 1-3-
2006-07-04
18:04:01
·
8 answers
·
asked by
SeeTheLight
7
in
Society & Culture
➔ Religion & Spirituality
Paul's action in having Timothy circumcised is not necessary unconsistent with what he taught in Galatians, since the two incidents are different.
Paul was violently opposed to any who made circucision necessary for salvation. But he never opposed it as helpful for evangelism.
Indeed, Paul said elsewhere, "to the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might win Jews " 1 Cor 9:20 )
However, when Judaizers insistead that "unless you are circumcised according to the custom of Moses, you cannot be saved" ( Acts 15:1 ), then Paul took an intractable stand against circumcision.
2006-07-07
20:03:20 ·
update #1