You are quite wrong. Volcanic activity now releases about 130 to 230 teragrams (145 million to 255 million short tons) of carbon dioxide each year. Volcanic releases are about 1% of the amount which is released by human activities.
Note the humans are releasing 100 times more CO2 than volcanos.
That is how global warming is our fault.
2006-07-04 15:28:53
·
answer #1
·
answered by Engineer 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
Maybe if you can explain why Mars is also experiencing global warming, you will have your answer. As for this planet, there are a few sources that I know of that describe the volcano effect on global warming. There was a Washington Post article in the early 90's stating the theory in this question, but I cannot find it at present (I do remember reading it in PDF though).
The best quote I found on this though:
"While the government cannot regulate volcanoes, the EPA has restricted S(sulfur) emissions from fossil fuels"
There are scientists, politicians, and everyone else that falls on one side of this issue or the other. And with people's time, effort, and especially money behind it, the issue is not going away any time soon.
2006-07-04 15:08:31
·
answer #2
·
answered by sct72 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Since global warming is mostly attributed to CO2 emissions, instead of toxins in general I will keep my answer to the subject of CO2 emissions man versus volcano.
The amount of CO2 that is released by all the volcanoes on earth is not known. Some of the volcanoes are under the sea and have not been measured. However according to a 1991 study (estimate) man produces 150 times the amount of CO2 that is released by the volcanoes on the earth.
This is not to say I know what Global warming is caused by :-)
2006-07-04 14:16:32
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ray 1
·
0⤊
0⤋
You may wish to check your facts....as well, global warming is due to a number of factors....all of which we have some control over. The cars that we drive; the excessive poser that we consume; the chemicals we put into the air all contribute to global warming. Now, unfortunately we seem to be more interested in pursuing commercial and industrial concerns than truly committing ourselves to rectifying the issues of global warming. If it has a negative effect on the balance sheet, we think we can hold off for another year, or two, or five or ten.... Sooner or later we will pay the price and we are already seeing the preliminary effects.
2006-07-04 15:21:57
·
answer #4
·
answered by Probster 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Even if that WERE true, we haven't stopped those volcanic eruptions yet, so we are ADDING our mess on top of it. Besides, if you run into the street and are hit by a car, DEAD IS DEAD. The driver may have been blind drunk, but you COULDN'T care anymore.
But I am still alive, and I happen to like myself that way. I prefer to have world with green trees, and birds for my unborn grandchildren to live in and enjoy.
Besides that, there is the MORAL aspect of over-consumption, we importing goods from countries that have poor people, and people still starve to death in this world. I do not believe this world has the capacity to support every person's consumption at the level I enjoy, so I feel a moral responsibility to try to reduce my consumption, in the hopes someday there will be a more equitable distribution of wealth on this planet.
So whether it is my fault or not, I am still affected by the problem. And the misdeeds of someone else, even a VOLCANO, do not absolve me of my social responsibility of my fellowman, who is everyone present or future on the planet.
2006-07-04 16:01:10
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Global warming is caused by more than "Toxins".I don't believe any volcano deforested more than several square miles,and these returned after a short period of time.But humans have deforested huge areas of the planet.This,in turn,has resulted in the reduced capacity to remove carbon dioxide.We have turned the grasslands of the world into a vast acreage of monoculture,which has shortened the period of time these tracts are covered with plants to a portion of the total growing season.
2006-07-04 14:55:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by foxspearman 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Because humans not only produce toxins they also destroy things that correct the released toxins. Such as, we cut trees in strategic places like the south American rain forests-lots of trees. And we cut lots of other trees for newspapers, magaZines and burearcrats- many forests a day that may not be replanted in some cases. We clear for developments etc. We interfere with the natural cleaning of our planet through the trees air and water. Volcanos produce toxins but are not nearly as deadly as the human.
2006-07-04 14:07:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by Elwood 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
climate and global warming is inter-concerning one yet another. As at the same time as the global warming will enhance it also impacts the elements. substitute contained in the elements is in straightforward words because of the global warming. global warming is actual led to through the chlorofluorocarbon coming from our significant different and toddlers works and in certain from the the refrigerators. because of the global warming the black hollow will enhance and the ozone layer decreases. If the ozone layer decreases straight away then it may reason various inflammation in our well being and the encompassing. Then the risky radiations of the daylight reaches to the earth and reason many pollutions and provides upward thrust to many new ailments and epidermis maximum cancers. the manufacturing of the co2 gases is very risky. it also finally ends up contained in the depletion of the ozone layer because it really is between the greenhouse gases. desire this answer may help u to write down ur essay. U could also complicated those factors.
2016-11-05 21:37:30
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
that's not true, you really should get an education and stop listening to idiots. If a single eruption caused as must toxins as we have, then human life would find it very hard to survive such a cataclysmic event.
Our poison is slow and steady, and far greater than your mind seems to be able to grasp.
2006-07-04 13:58:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by Big C 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
The pollution humans produce is much worse than that of a natural disaster. Take cigarette smoke, for instance, which produces over 100 different chemicals.
2006-07-04 14:03:41
·
answer #10
·
answered by nate 2
·
0⤊
0⤋